2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2242339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Dynamic Decision Problems In Economics

Abstract: This paper presents a new approach to solve dynamic decision models in economics. The proposed procedure, called Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC), relies on the iterative solution of optimal control problems on finite time horizons and is well established in engineering applications for stabilization and tracking problems. Only quite recently, extensions to more general optimal control problems including those appearing in economic applications have been investigated. Like Dynamic Programming (DP), NM… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These variables have then been contrasted with counterfactual simulated paths, where we assume cooperative behavior of the central bank and the fiscal authorities. These simulated paths are obtained by a numerical procedure, nonlinear model predictive control, as presented in Grüne, Semmler, and Stieler (). Our results in section 4 suggest that a cooperative solution is capable of providing superior results compared with the noncooperative scenario, reducing the danger of a break‐up of the euro area via decentralized, but coordinated fiscal policies in combination with a centralized monetary authority.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These variables have then been contrasted with counterfactual simulated paths, where we assume cooperative behavior of the central bank and the fiscal authorities. These simulated paths are obtained by a numerical procedure, nonlinear model predictive control, as presented in Grüne, Semmler, and Stieler (). Our results in section 4 suggest that a cooperative solution is capable of providing superior results compared with the noncooperative scenario, reducing the danger of a break‐up of the euro area via decentralized, but coordinated fiscal policies in combination with a centralized monetary authority.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data‐series will then be contrasted with counter‐factual simulations where we assume some cooperative behavior of the central bank and fiscal authorities. We trace the path of the above variables as suggested by cooperative behavior, and the cooperative solution is obtained by nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC), as described in Grüne, Semmler, and Stieler ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters of the matching functions are assumed to be: mB=0.5·F0.5B0.5 and mL=0.5·(s·scriptU)0.5V0.5. Applying the NMPC procedure of Grüne et al . () gives us solution paths such as those depicted in Figure .…”
Section: Growth Regimes and Financial Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high dimensionality of the problem precludes a closed‐form analytical solution, however. We first solve the model variants numerically using a new method called nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC, see Grüne et al ., ) that allows for approximately accurate solutions in finite horizon models. NMPC is a finite horizon solution method that can be applied to large scale macro systems and the dynamics can be explored on a finite horizon assuming limited information agents.…”
Section: Non‐technical Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case constitutes an alternative mechanism to expectation formation. Existing alternative treatments of expectations include the heterogeneous agent literature (Brock and Hommes, 1997;Chiarella, 1992;De Grauwe and Kaltwasser, 2012) or nonlinear model predictive control methods (Ernst and Semmler, 2013;Gruene et al, 2013) for instance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%