2011
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using phylogenies in conservation: new perspectives

Abstract: The 2011 meeting of the European Ecological Federation took place in Ávila, Spain, from 26th September to 29th September. The French Ecological Society (SFE) and the Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB) sponsored a session entitled ‘Evolutionary history, ecosystem function and conservation biology: new perspectives’. We report on the main insights obtained from this symposium.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of biodiversity indices that take into account the degree of phylogenetic relationship has emerged as a robust tool to balance the importance acquired by the local endemic taxa in many biogeographical analyses (Posadas et al 2001). Phylogenetic diversity has been proposed by some authors (Pio et al 2011) as a complementary measure to species richness, which favours a more accurate definition of biodiversity conservation priorities (Faith 1992;Polasky et al 2001;Rolland et al 2012). When prioritising areas of interest for conservation, the richness of rare, endangered or endemic species is usually used (Domínguez-Lozano et al 2000;Pérez-García et al 2012;Cañadas et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of biodiversity indices that take into account the degree of phylogenetic relationship has emerged as a robust tool to balance the importance acquired by the local endemic taxa in many biogeographical analyses (Posadas et al 2001). Phylogenetic diversity has been proposed by some authors (Pio et al 2011) as a complementary measure to species richness, which favours a more accurate definition of biodiversity conservation priorities (Faith 1992;Polasky et al 2001;Rolland et al 2012). When prioritising areas of interest for conservation, the richness of rare, endangered or endemic species is usually used (Domínguez-Lozano et al 2000;Pérez-García et al 2012;Cañadas et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed analyses of phylogenetic patterns of species threat have become an important ingredient in efforts to quantify the drivers and consequences of the current-day biodiversity crisis [19,20], though the utility of phylogenetic comparative analyses for conservation planning has been debated [21]. For instance, phylogenies have been used in comparative analyses to determine the biological attributes that predispose species to greater extinction risk [22] or to determine the amount of phylogenetic diversity that is being threatened by global change [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Any useful metric must include the evolutionary value of the species (Rolland et al 2012 ), where the most important and therefore the selected area is the one that harbors the highest biodiversity, but this does not mean the highest number of species but the highest number of unique species or evolutionary fronts. There are many approaches in the context of phylogenetic diversity and conservation, from community ecology to taxon or area conservation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%