2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using remote sensing to assess peatland resilience by estimating soil surface moisture and drought recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a blanket bog context, Hambley et al (2019) show net CO2 flux, monitored by eddy covariance, from former forestryconverted sites returning to similar values to that of a nearby undisturbed low altitude blanket bog. backscatter (e.g., Bechtold et al 2018;Lees et al 2021). Finally, although no prescribed burning or wildfires occurred within the footprint during the years of monitoring, however, for a complete C budget, we would also require information on the net methane fluxes to or from the atmosphere and any net losses via aquatic routes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a blanket bog context, Hambley et al (2019) show net CO2 flux, monitored by eddy covariance, from former forestryconverted sites returning to similar values to that of a nearby undisturbed low altitude blanket bog. backscatter (e.g., Bechtold et al 2018;Lees et al 2021). Finally, although no prescribed burning or wildfires occurred within the footprint during the years of monitoring, however, for a complete C budget, we would also require information on the net methane fluxes to or from the atmosphere and any net losses via aquatic routes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to calculate the resilience of these patterned vegetation systems is to consider rainfall as a perturbation event from a background dry state. Return rate following a perturbation can be taken as a direct measure of resilience (Lees et al, 2020; Pimm, 1984), with higher decay rates associated with more resilient systems. Usually this approach considers detrimental perturbations, instead we consider how vegetation responds to the beneficial perturbation of rainfall, yet we retain the definition that faster recovery to the background dry state equates to greater resilience (see Section 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple metrics have been employed to measure changes in resilience. Where individual perturbations can be clearly identified, the response time of a system to return back to its initial state can be directly measured (Lees et al, 2020; Pimm, 1984). Where a system is subject to continual stochastic perturbations (‘noise’), increasing temporal autocorrelation (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires that sampling of the system is more frequent than the inverse of the recovery rate. Other studies try to measure 'resilience' by measuring 'recovery time' as the time to return from the peak of a perturbation (close) to a presumed baseline equilibrium [9,27,28]. This can be used to compare response to the same event of uniform magnitude, e.g.…”
Section: Defining and Measuring Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%