Using replication research for just‐in‐time purchasing construct development

Kaynak, Hale; Hartley, Janet L.

doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.006

Cited by 54 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 116 publications

(241 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While our model of overall supply disruption risk does not focus on risk mitigation strategies, it does advance a context in which the conditional effectiveness of risk reducing activities may be studied. Previous research suggests that the number of suppliers for a particular purchased product, the size and location of inventory within the supply chain (Kull and Closs, 2008), use of early supplier involvement practices (Petersen et al, 2005), the adoption of specific supplier selection criteria (Talluri et al, 2006), the development of existing or new suppliers (Krause, 1999), and integration of logistical transportation and information systems (Kaynak and Hartley, 2006) may attenuate supply disruption risk. Additional risk mitigation tactics include: (1) contingency plan ning (Sheffi and Rice, 2005), (2) suppliers' investments in flexible manufacturing, back-up systems, and spare capacity, (3) buyer's investments in in-house manufacturing capabilities, and (4) buyer's and supplier's joint investment in the development of relational norms.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: A behavioral view and empirical assessment

Ellis

Henry

Shockley

2009

J of Ops Management

309

283

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As supply chains become more complex, firms face increasing risks of supply disruptions. The process through which buyers make decisions in the face of these risks, however, has not been explored. Despite research highlighting the importance of behavioral approaches to risk, there is limited research that applies these views of risk in the supply chain literature. This paper addresses this gap by drawing on behavioral risk theory to investigate the causal relationships amongst situation, representations of risk, and decision‐making within the purchasing domain. We operationalize and explore the relationship between three representations of supply disruption risk: magnitude of supply disruption, probability of supply disruption, and overall supply disruption risk. Additionally, we draw on exchange theories to identify product and market factors that impact buyers’ perceptions of the probability and magnitude of supply disruption. Finally, we look at how representations of risk affect the decision to seek alternative sources of supply. We test our model using data collected from 223 purchasing managers and buyers of direct materials. Our results show that both the probability and the magnitude of supply disruption are important to buyers’ overall perceptions of supply disruption risk. We also find that product and market situational factors impact perceptions of risk, but they are best understood through their impact on perceptions of probability and magnitude. Finally, we find that decisions are based on assessments of overall risk. These findings provide insight into the decision‐making process and show that all three representations of risk are necessary for fully understanding risky decision‐making with respect to supply disruptions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: A behavioral view and empirical assessment

Ellis

Henry

Shockley

2009

J of Ops Management

309

283

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For this study, reliability was estimated through Cronbach α coefficient as an indicator of the amount of present random error in the scale used for measurement (Kaynak & Hartley, 2006). The value 0.60 has been adopted for the lower level of Cronbach α acceptability.…”

Section: Methodology and Results On Operational And Employees Performmentioning

confidence: 99%

Operational and employees performance of Serbian industrial companies with ISO 9001 certificate

Brkic-Spasojevic¹,

Veljković²,

Stanojevic³

et al. 2017

JEMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Business performance is manifested through key performance indicators, which show the actual state in business enterprises and possible deviations from the business objectives that have been set. Due to new practices in transitional economies it is necessary to track business performance measures on company level. The most frequently studied types of performance in the available literature are quality, operational, market and financial, employee performance, innovation, project, aggregate firm performances, and customer satisfaction. This study empirically examines operational and employees performance on a sample of 113 Serbian industrial companies. After data collection through questionnaire usage, descriptive statistics, factor and reliability analysis were used to check if description of examined performances could be done using dimensions proposed according to results of the previous research in a statistically significant way. Examined operational and employees performances provided, have proved valid and reliable dimensions of Serbian industrial companies as a construct. The obtained results comply with previous research done in other countries and contexts. Future research could consist of a longitudinal study but as an examination of operational and employees` performance measures in other Serbian industrial sectors, too. Also, the relationship between operational and employees performance measures could be explored.

show abstract

“…Kaynak and Hartley (2006) designed JIT procurement research scale, including transport capacity and delivery batch, etc. [16].…”

Section: B Index Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kaynak and Hartley (2006) designed JIT procurement research scale, including transport capacity and delivery batch, etc. [16]. Ma Shihua et al (2007) studied logistics capability, and found that matching ability had significant positive influence on responsiveness, quality of service and logistics performance [17].…”

Section: B Index Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Construction of Evaluation Index System of supply logistics collaboration based on Supply-Hub

Zou¹

2015

Advances in Intelligent Systems Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. At present, theoretical studies on collaboration evaluation of supply logistics based on Supply-Chain were very few, while almost no researches were on its index system. The paper took supply logistics system based on Supply-Hub as research object, built up a framework of performance evaluation system, analyzed connotation of supply logistics collaboration based on Supply-Hub, adopted literature research as reference for indicators selection and Q-Sort method to test indicators to improve reliability and validity of this evaluation index system, and to provide support for subsequent research on supply logistics collaboration based on Supply-Hub.

show abstract

Using replication research for just‐in‐time purchasing construct development

Cited by 54 publications

References 116 publications

Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: A behavioral view and empirical assessment

Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: A behavioral view and empirical assessment

Operational and employees performance of Serbian industrial companies with ISO 9001 certificate

Construction of Evaluation Index System of supply logistics collaboration based on Supply-Hub

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About