2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54927-9_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using ROS in Multi-robot Systems: Experiences and Lessons Learned from Real-World Field Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These simulators tend to be provided only with direct flight of the quadcopter. This basic control is implented through the usual quadcopter joystick controllers without any other control implementation or access to the internal states of the quadcopter [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulators tend to be provided only with direct flight of the quadcopter. This basic control is implented through the usual quadcopter joystick controllers without any other control implementation or access to the internal states of the quadcopter [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En estas misiones se aplican diferentes configuraciones de flotas y morfologías de robots para adaptarse a diferentes escenarios. Estas flotas se pueden clasificar atendiendo a varios criterios (Garzón et al, 2017):…”
Section: Flotasunclassified
“…search and delivery during rescue missions -aerial robot searches and ground robots could deliver heavy equipment near to the victim). We can define four basic system types in relation to number of cooperating robots [9]: -singular -do not belong to MRS (multi-robot systems), robots working by themselves, the task does not require cooperation, -double -group consists of two robots cooperating with each other, robots are able to perform simple tasks e.g. moving objects, -multi-unit -consisting of a small group of robots, -swarms -consisting of a large group of robots.…”
Section: Robot Cooperation Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, we could define systems in relation to performance possibilities and morphology [9]: -identical -the same locomotion of all robots inside the group, -homogeneous -all robots have similar locomotion but not always the same, there are small differences in functionalities of each robot. Absence of one robot leads to the situation that the task could not be fully finished, -heterogeneous -different way of locomotion.…”
Section: Robot Cooperation Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%