2003
DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
150
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
150
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the aggregation of statewide administrative data (morbidity) can be problematic because data collection and recording techniques may not have been consistent, and data entry personnel and methods of disease classification may have Other Topics changed over time. 30 The response rate of the majority of studies that estimated the prevalence of risk factors associated with CVD was more than 70%, which is a satisfactory response rate. Some studies used objective 20,22 methods to measure biomedical risk factors for CVD while others used subjective methods.…”
Section: Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In particular, the aggregation of statewide administrative data (morbidity) can be problematic because data collection and recording techniques may not have been consistent, and data entry personnel and methods of disease classification may have Other Topics changed over time. 30 The response rate of the majority of studies that estimated the prevalence of risk factors associated with CVD was more than 70%, which is a satisfactory response rate. Some studies used objective 20,22 methods to measure biomedical risk factors for CVD while others used subjective methods.…”
Section: Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Databases such as the MBDS also have clear advantages (35). The data collected are usually completed in most hospital admissions and, as they include virtually all cases, provide reasonably accurate estimates of the incidence, prevalence, comorbidity, and mortality of diseases treated 1 Neither alcoholic gastritis nor excess blood alcohol level are included because there were no registered cases of either among patients with celiac disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dialysis facility errors in the collection and coding of Form CMS-2728 increase as data collection conflicts with other patient care priorities, as many individuals become involved in the collection process, and due to a host of other situational stimuli that increase the risk of mistakes and inconsistencies. 25 Future research may find that the accuracy of Form CMS-2728 data, as a potential indicator of clinical performance, can inform facility-level quality improvement efforts. 25 In sum, although lacking the sensitivity and specificity of claims data, Form CMS-2728 remains extremely valuable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Future research may find that the accuracy of Form CMS-2728 data, as a potential indicator of clinical performance, can inform facility-level quality improvement efforts. 25 In sum, although lacking the sensitivity and specificity of claims data, Form CMS-2728 remains extremely valuable. The use of Form CMS-2728 is legally mandated to assess patient Medicare eligibility, it provides an overarching picture of patient status at initiation of renal replacement therapy, and the form undergoes regular updating and refinement to buttress the quality of data obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%