Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference 2004
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2004.1384431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using scaled vehicles to investigate the influence of various properties on rollover propensity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A framework with multi-fidelity simulation and accompanying hardware platform for use in reinforcement learning problems relating to autonomous driving was presented in [12]. A 1:5 scale autonomous platform was developed to investigate stability control in [13], [14]. While these platforms were successfully used for the experiments in their respective publications, there is not enough public information available to be able to build, operate, and program one without essentially starting from scratch.…”
Section: Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A framework with multi-fidelity simulation and accompanying hardware platform for use in reinforcement learning problems relating to autonomous driving was presented in [12]. A 1:5 scale autonomous platform was developed to investigate stability control in [13], [14]. While these platforms were successfully used for the experiments in their respective publications, there is not enough public information available to be able to build, operate, and program one without essentially starting from scratch.…”
Section: Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scaled vehicles ranging in size from 1:16 to 1:5 the size of an actual vehicle, often based on radio controlled (RC) vehicles, are easier and less expensive to operate than a full-sized platform. Despite recent progress and many publications detailing scaled autonomous testbeds [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], much of the available results lack reproducibility because of the one-off nature of these testbeds, restrictions imposed by the use of private datasets, and inconsistent testing methods. Inconsistency is an especially critical problem, as many researchers should be able to test and compare potential algorithms under the same conditions and platforms in order to be able to obtain meaningful comparisons and advance the science of high-speed autonomy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HiL (hardware-in-the-loop) simulations can offer a degree of feedback from individual components of the real system (Schuette & Waeltermann, 2005). Scaled vehicles have been used especially in universities to investigate various vehicle control systems performance and validate models: rollover propensity (Travis et al, 2004), backing-up driver assistance (Chiu & Goswami, 2012), vehicle stability control (Lapapong et al, 2009), anti-lock brake actuation and control (Patil & Longoria, 2007). Simulation and use of scalar vehicles are preferred due to lower costs and development times, but they do not ensure subjective (human) feedback on the dynamic behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a vehicle dynamics prediction system needs a mathematic model and current vehicle state values [1–6]. There are two concerns regarding the mathematic model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two concerns regarding the mathematic model. First, many reports employ simplified vehicle models in the dynamics prediction, such as 2 DOF model [1], 4 DOF [2], and 2 DOF yaw-roll model [1–3,6]. The prediction results may only be acceptable for limited purposes and driving conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%