2018
DOI: 10.1029/2017wr022498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Sensor Data to Dynamically Map Large‐Scale Models to Site‐Scale Forecasts: A Case Study Using the National Water Model

Abstract: There has been an explosive growth in the ability to model large water systems. While these models are effective at routing water across massive scales, they do not yet forecast the street‐level information desired by local decision makers. Simultaneously, the increasing affordability of sensors has made it possible for even small communities to measure the state of their watersheds. However, these real‐time measurements are often not attached to a predictive model, thus making them less useful for application… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative to relying on historical calibration is to adopt data‐assimilation modeling approaches which can update model parameters in response to observations (Liu & Gupta, 2007; Merz et al., 2011; Pathiraja et al., 2016). Data assimilation is valuable for improving short‐term predictions in response to non‐stationarity or simply in response to more observational data availability (e.g., model “learning”; Fries & Kerkez, 2018; Hutton et al., 2014; Milly et al., 2008)—an approach with strong synergies to “adaptive management” philosophies (Dietze et al., 2018). However, data assimilation is necessarily data‐hungry, limiting its application to well observed systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to relying on historical calibration is to adopt data‐assimilation modeling approaches which can update model parameters in response to observations (Liu & Gupta, 2007; Merz et al., 2011; Pathiraja et al., 2016). Data assimilation is valuable for improving short‐term predictions in response to non‐stationarity or simply in response to more observational data availability (e.g., model “learning”; Fries & Kerkez, 2018; Hutton et al., 2014; Milly et al., 2008)—an approach with strong synergies to “adaptive management” philosophies (Dietze et al., 2018). However, data assimilation is necessarily data‐hungry, limiting its application to well observed systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IFIS provides real-time information on streams and weather conditions that incorporates advanced rainfall-runoff models for flood prediction and mapping. Fries and Kerkez (2018) used water level sensors across the state of Iowa and outputs from the National Water Model (NWM) to dynamically map largescale models to site-scale forecasts for flood warnings. In a consequence, Barker and Macleod (2019) developed a prototype as a real-time social geodata pipeline for flood data collection and visualization across Scotland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%