Using social representations theory to make sense of climate change: what scientists and nonscientists in Australia think

Abstract

ABSTRACT. The mass media has ensured that the challenging and complex phenomenon of climate change now has the household familiarity of a brand name. But what is it that is understood by climate change, and by whom? What frame of reference is drawn upon to communicate meaningfully about climate change? Do particular subgroups within our society hold different understandings, or have the debate and the prolific dissemination of information about this issue coalesced around a core perception or image of what climate change is? To answer these questions, we conceptualized climate change within the theory of social representations as emergent socially constructed knowledge. We analyzed word association data collected in Australia from persons identifying as having a scientific, government, or general public background (N = 3300). All respondents were asked to write the first words that came to mind when they thought about climate change. Comparative analyses of the word associations reveal that respondents from different backgrounds define climate change in different ways. The results suggest that there is a common core set of concepts shared by the different groups, but there are also a great many differences in how climate change is framed and conceived by respondents. The results are discussed in relation to what they imply for responses to climate change by these social groups and in relation to interventions designed to encourage climate adaptation.

Determinants of Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change among Smallholder Rural Households in the Bongo District, Ghana

“…In this study, 51.7% of smallholder rural households that perceived changes in rainfall pattern implemented adaptation/coping strategies whilst 48.3% who perceived changes in rainfall pattern did not adopt or implement adaptation strategies. This is in conformity with the social representation theory (Moloney et al, 2014), which argues that "behavior is not causally related to beliefs. Rather, beliefs and behavior coexist as part of a system of meaning used to understand an issue".…”

How Distant is Climate Change? Construal Level Theory Analysis of German and Taiwanese Students Statements

“…The solution of these two challenges was found to be inherent in the 10 Statements Test. This type of test has commonalities with the method of continued word associations and with the elicitation task, all previously used for exploring images of climate change among individuals (Bostrom et al, 1994;Lorenzoni et al, 2006;Moloney et al, 2014).…”

Can sense-making tools inform adaptation policy? A practitioner’s perspective

“…Although not normally part of a SenseMaker survey design, its inclusion in this case allowed the research team to solicit additional useful information. The team was interested in what words respondents were most likely to associate with climate change with the aim of helping those in policy practice in Canada and Australia to get to know and understand people's mental framing of climate change (Moloney et al 2014). Such methods may reveal contradictions between people's representations of climate change and their experiences of climate change.…”