Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Data Engineering for Wireless and Mobile Access 2001
DOI: 10.1145/376868.376899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using space-time grid for efficient management of moving objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to be able to compare our proposal with the FNR-Tree, we changed the generator to reflect this limitation. 4 Hence, changes of speed inside of line segments (edges for the FNR-Tree model) are simply ignored. If an object changes its direction within a line segment, and goes back to the same point, this movement is also ignored, but the time spent is accumulated to its next movement.…”
Section: Data Sets Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to be able to compare our proposal with the FNR-Tree, we changed the generator to reflect this limitation. 4 Hence, changes of speed inside of line segments (edges for the FNR-Tree model) are simply ignored. If an object changes its direction within a line segment, and goes back to the same point, this movement is also ignored, but the time spent is accumulated to its next movement.…”
Section: Data Sets Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some structures focus on indexing the current locations of moving objects; for example, hashing [Song and Roussopoulos 2001a], the LUR-tree [Kwon et al 2002], the LUGrid , the CT-R-tree ], the R R -tree [Biveinis et al 2007], and the RP-tree [Lin et al 2006]. For indexing the current and future positions of moving objects, some methods are the TPR-tree [Saltenis et al 2000], the TPR*-tree [Tao et al 2003b], the VCI (see Section 5.3), the STP-tree [Tao et al 2004a], STRIPES [Patel et al 2004], the B x -tree ], the B dual -tree [Yiu et al 2008], the spacetime grid [Chon et al 2001b], the STAR-tree [Procopiuc et al 2002], or the proposal in [Aggarwal and Agrawal 2003] for non-linear trajectories. Finally, in [Lin et al 2005] and [Pelanis et al 2006], the BB x -index and the R P P F -tree, respectively, are proposed as integrated approaches to index the past, present and future locations of moving objects.…”
Section: Indexing Moving Objects In Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Su et al in [17] presented a data model for moving objects based on linear constraint databases. Chon et al in [4] proposed a Space-Time Grid Storage model for moving objects. In [9], Güting et al presented a data model and data structures for moving objects based on abstract data types.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wolfson et al in [16,21] firstly proposed a Moving Objects Spatio-Temporal (MOST) model, which represents the location as a dynamic attribute. Later, the model based on linear constrain [17], abstract data types [9] and SpaceTime Grid Storage [4] for moving objects have been proposed. However, in most real life applications, objects move within constrained networks, especially the transportation networks (e.g., vehicles move on road networks).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%