2018
DOI: 10.3996/112016-jfwm-085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Species Distribution Models to Guide Field Surveys for an Apparently Rare Aquatic Beetle

Abstract: Surveying for rare animals can be difficult but using models to predict suitable habitat can guide sampling efforts. We used models to predict suitable habitat for the Narrow-footed Hygrotus Diving Beetle Hygrotus diversipes (diving beetle hereafter), a dytiscid beetle that is known from 10 streams in central Wyoming. The diving beetle was a category-2 Candidate species for listing as Threatened or Endangered in the Endangered Species Act between 1989 and 1996, and was petitioned for listing in 2007, 2008, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, two SDMs, MaxEnt and RF, which are based on the principles of machine‐learning methods, are selected to model the potential distributions of neotenic Lycidae in view of their stable and robust performances with limited presence data (Hernandez et al, 2006; Mi et al, 2017; Williams et al, 2009). In addition, combining the predictions of two SDMs can further help target surveys to locations with high probabilities of presence as predicted by the two algorithms (Tronstad et al, 2018). Therefore, based on the objective evidence between the neotenic Lycidae and the environmental variables obtained by different SDMs, a comprehensive and accurate evaluation system for conservation strategies can be established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, two SDMs, MaxEnt and RF, which are based on the principles of machine‐learning methods, are selected to model the potential distributions of neotenic Lycidae in view of their stable and robust performances with limited presence data (Hernandez et al, 2006; Mi et al, 2017; Williams et al, 2009). In addition, combining the predictions of two SDMs can further help target surveys to locations with high probabilities of presence as predicted by the two algorithms (Tronstad et al, 2018). Therefore, based on the objective evidence between the neotenic Lycidae and the environmental variables obtained by different SDMs, a comprehensive and accurate evaluation system for conservation strategies can be established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, combining the predictions of two SDMs can further help target surveys to locations with high probabilities of presence as predicted by the two algorithms (Tronstad et al, 2018). Therefore, based on the objective evidence between the neotenic Lycidae and the environmental variables obtained by different SDMs, a comprehensive and accurate evaluation system for conservation strategies can be established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this limitation, two models in particular, maximum entropy (MaxEnt) (Phillips et al ., 2006) and Random Forest (Breiman, 2001), have consistently provided robust estimates for species with limited presence data (Hernandez et al ., 2006; Williams et al ., 2009; Mi et al ., 2017). Combining the predictions of these models may further help target surveys to locations with a high probability of presence as predicted by both algorithms (Tronstad et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach calls for the acquisition of detailed habitat information to study factors influencing species distribution and abundance (assumption-driven research), the development of models linking populations to their habitat (biological planning), and the development of maps predicting patterns in the ecosystem (conservation design ;USFWS 2008b). Such maps and models are commonly used to assess status and threats to species recovery, and to forecast effects of habitat alteration (Germaine et al 2014;Tronstad et al 2018). The 2003 Recovery Plan for Fat Threeridge-a management plan that provides guidance for species recovery-identifies increasing the number of viable subpopulations (i.e., occupied sites) through discovery or reintroduction, and monitoring subpopulations and their habitats, among the six primary objectives for achieving recovery (USFWS 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%