2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using stressor gradients to determine reference expectations for great river fish assemblages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These reference conditions are usually defined as minimally disturbed or least disturbed (i.e., little evidence of human disturbance or systems with the best extant physical, chemical, and biological habitat conditions in the current human-dominated landscape; Stoddard et al 2006). Reference sites are usually selected by means of screening criteria based on stressor response information and expert judgment, which are used to obtain threshold values that enable different condition classes of the system to be characterized (Karr and Chu 1999;Bailey et al 2004;Angradi et al 2009). The reference systems selected for the present paper were littoral wetlands on the coasts of Southern Spain where the study area is located.…”
Section: Selection Of Baseline Sites Of Ecological Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These reference conditions are usually defined as minimally disturbed or least disturbed (i.e., little evidence of human disturbance or systems with the best extant physical, chemical, and biological habitat conditions in the current human-dominated landscape; Stoddard et al 2006). Reference sites are usually selected by means of screening criteria based on stressor response information and expert judgment, which are used to obtain threshold values that enable different condition classes of the system to be characterized (Karr and Chu 1999;Bailey et al 2004;Angradi et al 2009). The reference systems selected for the present paper were littoral wetlands on the coasts of Southern Spain where the study area is located.…”
Section: Selection Of Baseline Sites Of Ecological Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of the reference ecosystem conditions is generally based upon observations and measurements made in locations that represent a certain status or condition class of ecological integrity (Angradi et al 2009). These reference conditions are usually defined as minimally disturbed or least disturbed (i.e., little evidence of human disturbance or systems with the best extant physical, chemical, and biological habitat conditions in the current human-dominated landscape; Stoddard et al 2006).…”
Section: Selection Of Baseline Sites Of Ecological Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In selecting land use hypotheses and subsequently estimating their degree of severity, we took into consideration actual situations in the study area and its surroundings [39,46,50,[66][67][68][69], along with planned uses in the PAs according to the categories established by the IUCN [4], considering that, at present in Spanish PAs, the main vectors of disturbance described are urban development in the territory, excessive pressure by visitors and certain agricultural or livestock farming practices [70]. Land use hypotheses were also considered according to what is established by Spanish law as permissible activities in the different categories of protected areas.…”
Section: Land Use Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large lowland rivers tend to be regionally unique, so even if undisturbed lowland rivers were to be found, they would not necessarily be a valid reference for other rivers. While it is possible to derive RC(BI) for rivers lacking data through modeling or expert opinion (e.g., Wessell et al 2008;Angradi et al 2009;Davies et al 2010), this approach would not be without risks. A large lowland river is typically developed along its entire length, so LDC would generally represent a considerably impaired state and therefore lead to overly optimistic assessments of river health (Wessell et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%