2018
DOI: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2018.17113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using subcutaneous methotrexate to prolong duration of methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our real-life study, MTX monotherapy optimization showed equally effective results on DAS28 and HAQ-DI in almost three-quarters of the patients when compared with bDMARDs initiation ± MTX. Indeed, several studies have shown that MTX optimization is a valuable choice with numerous benefits, potentially avoiding or at least delaying the introduction of costly targeted therapies [ 17 , 18 ]. For instance, the efficacy of MTX dose optimization was recently demonstrated in 314 RA patients from the early arthritis Etude et Suivi des Polyarthrites Indifférenciées Récentes (ESPOIR) cohort receiving MTX as a first DMARD (53%) [mean dose 12.2 (3.8) mg/week].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our real-life study, MTX monotherapy optimization showed equally effective results on DAS28 and HAQ-DI in almost three-quarters of the patients when compared with bDMARDs initiation ± MTX. Indeed, several studies have shown that MTX optimization is a valuable choice with numerous benefits, potentially avoiding or at least delaying the introduction of costly targeted therapies [ 17 , 18 ]. For instance, the efficacy of MTX dose optimization was recently demonstrated in 314 RA patients from the early arthritis Etude et Suivi des Polyarthrites Indifférenciées Récentes (ESPOIR) cohort receiving MTX as a first DMARD (53%) [mean dose 12.2 (3.8) mg/week].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S.c. MTX has shown improved clinical efficacy [ 19 ], improved bioavailability, especially at doses >15 mg/week [ 20 ], and improved treatment survival, when compared with oral MTX [ 21–23 ]. Moreover, a retrospective cohort study on >7000 patients showed that the use of s.c. MTX, compared with oral, was associated with longer duration of MTX monotherapy before addition/switching to bDMARDs [ 18 ]. Although no randomized controlled trials have yet directly compared s.c. MTX monotherapy vs targeted therapies ± MTX, several observational analyses have shown that the first option was more cost effective for patients and for society as a whole [ 21 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, data from a randomized controlled trial of 375 MTX-naïve RA patients favoured initiation of 15 mg once weekly MTX therapy by the SC route, which resulted in higher ACR20 and 70 response rates than oral MTX with a similar safety profile at 24 weeks [111]. Furthermore, in a large retrospective cohort study, Harris et al reported that patients taking SC MTX received higher starting and maximum doses than those on oral MTX (>15 mg starting dose and >20 mg maximum dose) [130], perhaps reflecting the better tolerability of the parenterally delivered drug.…”
Section: How To Get the Most Out Of Mtx As A First-line Treatment?mentioning
confidence: 99%