2014
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.140129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using SUV as a Guide to 18F-FDG Dose Reduction

Abstract: This article explores how one can lower the injected 18 F-FDG dose while maintaining validity in comparing standardized uptake values (SUVs) between studies. Variations of the SUV within each lesion were examined at different acquisition times. Methods: Our protocol was approved by either the Human Investigation Committee or the Institutional Review Board. All 120 PET datasets were acquired continuously for 180 s per bed position in list mode and were reconstructed to obtain 30-, 60-, 90-, 120-, 150-, and 180-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We administered an activity of 3.5 MBq/kg body weight that is lower to those used in prior [ 18 F]FDG/PET studies (4.8-5.2 MBq/kg of body weight [4]). However, while a lower signal to noise ratio can result from lower activity, no effect on SUV is expected [18]. In our protocol, we subsequently acquired PET/CT and PET/MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We administered an activity of 3.5 MBq/kg body weight that is lower to those used in prior [ 18 F]FDG/PET studies (4.8-5.2 MBq/kg of body weight [4]). However, while a lower signal to noise ratio can result from lower activity, no effect on SUV is expected [18]. In our protocol, we subsequently acquired PET/CT and PET/MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of a reduction of acquisition time on image quality or lesion detectability can be investigated by acquiring data in list mode, so that the raw data can be rebinned to simulate scans acquired with reduced acquisition times [13–15]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies suggested the effective dose from PET/CT to be in the range of 10-30 mSv, depending on the activity of 18 F-FDG injected (0.02 mSv/MBq, according to International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 106) and the CT protocol (1-20 mSv) (3)(4)(5)(6)(7). In light of recent evidence that radiation exposure from medical imaging may carry a risk of cancer (1,2,7), we determined that a dose reduction from 555 MBq (15 mCi) to 370 MBq (10 mCi) does not affect SUV max semiquantification or image quality (8). However, we suspected that dose could be reduced further without affecting SUV semiquantification or image quality using our standard PET data acquisition of 3 min per bed position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%