1991
DOI: 10.1016/0038-0121(91)90008-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the analytic hierarchy process in water resources planning: Selection of flood control projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [23], the authors used AHP to select the optimal flood control projects for the Grand River and Tar Creek in Miami, USA. In India, flood risk analysis using AHP and mapped by GIS has been applied to the Kosi River Basin [24].…”
Section: Spatial Information and Multi-criteria Evaluation For Flood mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23], the authors used AHP to select the optimal flood control projects for the Grand River and Tar Creek in Miami, USA. In India, flood risk analysis using AHP and mapped by GIS has been applied to the Kosi River Basin [24].…”
Section: Spatial Information and Multi-criteria Evaluation For Flood mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the recent advancement of spatial information systems allows the integration of diverse data with MCA/MCE methods, few researchers have employed this technique for water resource management, particularly fl ood risk assessment ) . However, several studies considered the MCA or related approach in the evaluation of fl ood mitigation measures (Haque et al 2012 ;Akter and Simonovic 2005 ;Willett and Sharda 1991 ) . These studies are based on fi eld surveys or secondary data to evaluate fl ood risk alleviation; however, they did not account for the spatial component (Kubal et al 2009 ) .…”
Section: Flood Hazards Vulnerability and Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of the AHP multicriteria method (Saaty, 1980) has the following advantages; its methodology is similar to that used in common sense of decision makers, making the method easier for them to understand, it allows the assessment of both objective and subjective criteria, through the pairwise comparison of all alternatives, it relies on judgment data of experts and provides techniques that examine the consistency of the criteria weights and rankings of the alternatives (Bryson and Mobolurin, 1994;Calantone et al, 1999;Dey, 2002;Moffett and Sarkar, 2006). AHP has been used as a decision-making tool in various research fields, including project management (Al-Harbi, 2001), supply chain management (Calantone et al, 1999;Korpela et al, 2001), benchmarking of business functions (Eyrich, 1991;Korpela and Tuominen, 1996), natural resources management (Kangas and Kangas, 2005;Willett and Sharda, 1991) and investments (Jain and Nag, 1996;Levary and Wan, 1999).…”
Section: Ahp For Optimum Transcontinental Pipeline Routementioning
confidence: 99%