2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.serrev.2013.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Diffusion of Innovation Concept to Explain the Factors That Contribute to the Adoption Rate of E-journal Publishing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uniqueness or exclusiveness has been a critical analysis of product innovativeness and has offered as the primary dimension at times (Hoeffler & Keller, 2003;Rogers, 2003, Valente & Rogers, 1995Sanni et al, 2013;Schiffman & Kanuk, 2004a;2004b;Singh et al, 2012;Tidd, 2010;Tidd et al, 1997). So, this prompts a definition whereby the level of innovativeness is not a distinct development but rather equals to the degree of originality.…”
Section: Innovativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniqueness or exclusiveness has been a critical analysis of product innovativeness and has offered as the primary dimension at times (Hoeffler & Keller, 2003;Rogers, 2003, Valente & Rogers, 1995Sanni et al, 2013;Schiffman & Kanuk, 2004a;2004b;Singh et al, 2012;Tidd, 2010;Tidd et al, 1997). So, this prompts a definition whereby the level of innovativeness is not a distinct development but rather equals to the degree of originality.…”
Section: Innovativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Scholarly Communication Process model presented by Jisc (2015). We also find this type of theory applied to questions of scientific resource discovery in the private sector (Schonfeld, 2016), adoption rates of e-publishing (Sanni et al, 2013), and the use of pre-print servers (Meyer & Kling, 2002). Theories of this type are the most likely of any to be considered "theories of explaining", since when developed rigorously they offer not just a representation of the status of relationships and processes, but of their underlying causal effects.…”
Section: Theory Generationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In other words, both theories are directly relevant to important and pressing aspects of OA research. In the case of Innovation Diffusion Theory, we found it most often used to explore specific aspects of OA, particularly institutional repository development (Bamigbola, 2014;Dorner & Revell, 2012a;Kingsley, 2008;Pinfield et al, 2014;Stanton & Liew, 2011a;Swanepoel, 2005;Xu, 2008), OA journal development (Ayeni, 2017;Greco, 2016;Sanni, Ngah, Karim, Abdullah, & Waheed, 2013), and the availability and use of central OA funds (Hampson, 2014;Pinfield & Middleton, 2016). Other uses were broader, with the theory applied to the diffusion of OA in general terms (Costa, 2006;Xia, 2012).…”
Section: Use Of Existing Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research model did not include trialability and observability in the study. Sanni et al (2013) drew upon the Diffusion of Innovation Theory to examine five attributes of ejournals as possible influences to the rate of e-journal publishing adoption. Their research findings showed that only complexity and trialability emerge as significant contributors to e-journal adoption rates.…”
Section: Contribution Of This Paper To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies confirmed the perceived characteristics of innovation identified by Rogers (1983Rogers ( , 1995. They explained technology adoption behavior in specific technology contexts, but the results of salient perception factors were inconsistent (Liao & Lu, 2008;Lin, 2011;Huang & Hsieh, 2012;& Sanni et al, 2013). Therefore, based on the original study by Rogers (1983), the following hypotheses were tested: H1: The perceived characteristics of innovation of e-book have a positive impact on users' purchase intention.…”
Section: Contribution Of This Paper To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%