2010
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889810018601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using thet-distribution to improve the absolute structure assignment with likelihood calculations

Abstract: The previously described method for absolute structure determination [Hooft, Straver & Spek (2008). J. Appl. Cryst.41, 96–103] assumes a Gaussian error distribution. The method is now extended to make it robust against poor data with large systematic errors with the introduction of the Student t‐distribution. It is shown that this modification makes very little difference for good data but dramatically improves results for data with a non‐Gaussian error distribution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the Baysian statistical analysis of Hooft, Straver, and Spek, implemented in PLATON [18], also predicts that the structure has the correct absolute configuration (P3 true = 1.000) and that there is no probability of the structure being a racemic twin (P3 rac-twin = 0.000). Similar results are obtained regardless of whether a Gaussian or a Student’s t -distribution is used [20]. For the sake of completeness, the structure was also fully refined in P2 1 /m.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Furthermore, the Baysian statistical analysis of Hooft, Straver, and Spek, implemented in PLATON [18], also predicts that the structure has the correct absolute configuration (P3 true = 1.000) and that there is no probability of the structure being a racemic twin (P3 rac-twin = 0.000). Similar results are obtained regardless of whether a Gaussian or a Student’s t -distribution is used [20]. For the sake of completeness, the structure was also fully refined in P2 1 /m.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Calculations using PLATON (Spek, 2009) yielded values for the Hooft (Hooft et al, 2010) and Parsons parameters (intensity quotients) (Parsons et al, 2013) of 0.19 (11) and 0.18 (8), respectively. Though the values of the Flack, Hooft and Parsons parameters rather point to the absolute structure determination, the standard uncertainties are too high for the unequivocal assignment of the absolute structure.…”
Section: Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All H atoms were located in difference maps. The correct absolute configuration for the molecules of compound (V) in the crystal selected for data collection was determined by the Flack x parameter (Flack, 1983) of 0.11 (15), calculated using 1344 quotients of the type [(I + ) À (I À )]/[(I + ) + (I À )] (Parsons et al, 2013); the corresponding Hooft y parameter (Hooft et al, 2010) of 0.10 (13) was calculated using 1392 Bijvoet pairs (97% coverage). For compound (III), the low-angle reflection 002, which had been partially attenuated by the beam stop, was omitted from the final refinements.…”
Section: Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the crystal of (V) selected for data collection, the values of the Flack x parameter (Flack, 1983) and the Hooft y parameter (Hooft et al, 2010), calculated for the R configuration, were x = 0.11 (15) and y = 0.10 (13). 1-6).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%