2014
DOI: 10.1002/per.1925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Implicit Association Test to Assess Risk Propensity Self–Concept: Analysis of Its Predictive Validity on A Risk–Taking Behaviour in A Natural Setting

Abstract: Esta es la versión de autor del artículo publicado en: This is an author produced version of a paper published in: showed that the IAT-RPSC scores exhibited good reliability, and were positively correlated to several self-report and indirect measures, providing evidence for convergent validity. Most importantly, the IAT-RPSC scores predicted risk-taking behavior in a natural setting with real consequences above and beyond all other self-report and indirect measures analyzed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(149 reference statements)
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative strength of these associations (as indexed by reaction times) reflects individuals' automatic or implicit attitudes. For instance, an IAT designed to assess individual risk propensity uses the categories "me" and "not me" and attributes "risky" and "secure" [67]. Individuals with high risk propensity are typically quicker to associate "me" with "risky" than "me" with "secure, " and these implicit attitudes predict higher risk-taking behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative strength of these associations (as indexed by reaction times) reflects individuals' automatic or implicit attitudes. For instance, an IAT designed to assess individual risk propensity uses the categories "me" and "not me" and attributes "risky" and "secure" [67]. Individuals with high risk propensity are typically quicker to associate "me" with "risky" than "me" with "secure, " and these implicit attitudes predict higher risk-taking behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Go/No-go Association Task), el IAT muestra niveles de consistencia interna que oscilan entre 0,70 y 0,90 . En los estudios realizados en países de habla hispana que analizan la consistencia interna del IAT se observan resultados similares que fluctúan entre 0,75 y 0,93 (Sánchez-Miranda, 2016;Horcajo et al, 2014;Sánchez & Vinzoneo, 2013;Sánchez, de la Garza González, & Isolde Hedlefs, 2016). Sin embargo, su debilidad principal se halla en la confiabilidad test-retest, puesto que se observan valores de 0,25 a 0,69 con una estimación promedio de 0,50, independientemente de la duración del intervalo entre cada momento (Lane et al, 2007).…”
Section: Confiabilidad Del Iatunclassified
“…Por su parte, existen otros estudios latinoamericanos sobre dominios menos estudiados (e.g. actitudes hacia conductas en el tránsito, relación entre riesgo y auto-concepto, y preferencia por la naturaleza), donde se observan correlaciones de bajas a moderadas (Ledesma et al, 2015;Horcajo et al, 2014;Olivos & Aragonés, 2013). En correspondencia con la literatura inglesa, estas variaciones en el efecto del dominio sobre la consistencia entre medidas podrían asociarse al grado de espontaneidad al momento de responder a las medidas directas.…”
Section: Relación Con Medidas Explícitasunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations