1985
DOI: 10.2307/1924810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Estimate the Effect of Training Programs

Abstract: This research was supported, in part, by SRI International. We are grateful to Terry Johnson and Richard West for helpful discussions. The research reported here is part of the NBIER's research program in Labor Studies and project in Government Budget. Any opinions expressed are those of the authors and not those of the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
514
0
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 943 publications
(531 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
514
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Essentially, DID framework requires two groups (treated and control), at least two time periods (before and after) and an outcome variable of interest (Card & Krueger, 1994;Ashenfelter & Card, 1985;Hastings, 2004). In the context of this study, the treatment is AP (implemented only by government schools).…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, DID framework requires two groups (treated and control), at least two time periods (before and after) and an outcome variable of interest (Card & Krueger, 1994;Ashenfelter & Card, 1985;Hastings, 2004). In the context of this study, the treatment is AP (implemented only by government schools).…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ a difference-in-difference strategy that is integrated with the Poisson, generalized Poisson, and ZIP regression models. The DID method innovated by Ashenfelter and Card (1985) is used as an evaluation method to make causal inferences [26]. This method is widely applied to evaluate the impact of public policies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of D-i-D method became very widespread in the field of evaluating the impact of a policy or program, especially after research work by Ashenfelter and Card (1985). Other early scholars greatly associated with this estimation method include Card and Krueger (1994), Meyer (1995), andHastings (2004).…”
Section: Analysis Technique/ Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%