2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the N/C ratio to correct bulk radiocarbon ages from lake sediments: Insights from Chilean Patagonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This systematic difference between ages of tephra determined from lake compared to bog deposits is statistically significant. Bertrand et al (2012) demonstrated that bulk radiocarbon AMS age dates from lake sediments were 300 to 1,100 years older than true ages in some northern Patagonian lakes due to variable inputs of terrestrial organic carbon from the Holocene soils that cover the lake watersheds. However, our finding of nearly identical radiocarbon ages for H1 from multiple small, closed-basin lakes located at different elevations, in watersheds having contrasting slopes and degrees of soil development, argues against site-specific processes of soil erosion and redeposition for the striking radiocarbon synchrony among lakes.…”
Section: H1 Eruption Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This systematic difference between ages of tephra determined from lake compared to bog deposits is statistically significant. Bertrand et al (2012) demonstrated that bulk radiocarbon AMS age dates from lake sediments were 300 to 1,100 years older than true ages in some northern Patagonian lakes due to variable inputs of terrestrial organic carbon from the Holocene soils that cover the lake watersheds. However, our finding of nearly identical radiocarbon ages for H1 from multiple small, closed-basin lakes located at different elevations, in watersheds having contrasting slopes and degrees of soil development, argues against site-specific processes of soil erosion and redeposition for the striking radiocarbon synchrony among lakes.…”
Section: H1 Eruption Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiocarbon dating was done on a parallel core collected from the lake, and depths of both cores were correlated using magnetic susceptibility and organic content profiles. The dating, organic content measurement, and charcoal analysis are described in detail elsewhere (Bertrand et al 2012;Araneda et al 2013). The macrocharcoal particles ([125 lm) in sediment subsamples were disaggregated in hot (70°C) 10 % KOH solution for 20 min, sieved through a 125-lm mesh, and the retained particles were counted under a stereomicroscope as detailed by Araneda et al 2013.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The old-carbon offsets are the age differences between bulk organic matter and leaf samples. Although it is well known that using 14 C ages of bulk organic matter overestimates the sedimentation age (Bjorck et al, 1998;Wang et al, 2002;Xu and Zheng, 2003;Fallu et al, 2004;Bertrand et al, 2012;Hou et al, 2012;Yamane et al, 2014), studies discussing the cause of down core variability in old-carbon offsets are scarce (Blaauw et al, 2011;Gaglioti et al, 2014). Here, we propose that 14 C offsets are causally linked to surface processes and soil dynamics in the catchment, driven by hydroclimate variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%