2015
DOI: 10.1111/ijtd.12047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the training reactions questionnaire to analyze the reactions of university students undergoing career‐related training inJordan: a prospective human resource development approach

Abstract: The primary purpose of the present study was to validate Morgan and Casper's training reactions questionnaire (TRQ) for use in Jordan. The study also investigated the reactions of university students to career-related training programs. Another purpose of the study was to determine the impact of certain aspects of training programs on the overall satisfaction of university students with the quality of the programs. The validated TRQ was administered to a purposive sample of 304 participants who completed at le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model is the most established and, consequently, the most widely utilized evaluation framework in organizations (Kong & Jacobs, 2012), and training experts frequently use this model to evaluate training interventions (Kennedy et al, 2013). Kirkpatrick’s model is widely accepted due to, inter alia, its simplicity and ease of use (Alliger & Janak, 1989; Alvarez et al, 2004; Grohmann & Kauffeld, 2013; Khasawneh & Al-Zawahreh, 2015; Liebermann & Hoffmann, 2008). Many other evaluation models are built on Kirkpatrick’s framework (Kong & Jacobs, 2012).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is the most established and, consequently, the most widely utilized evaluation framework in organizations (Kong & Jacobs, 2012), and training experts frequently use this model to evaluate training interventions (Kennedy et al, 2013). Kirkpatrick’s model is widely accepted due to, inter alia, its simplicity and ease of use (Alliger & Janak, 1989; Alvarez et al, 2004; Grohmann & Kauffeld, 2013; Khasawneh & Al-Zawahreh, 2015; Liebermann & Hoffmann, 2008). Many other evaluation models are built on Kirkpatrick’s framework (Kong & Jacobs, 2012).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the reaction to the training was measured using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with 5 being the best value. The questionnaire consisted of five questions about the students' perspectives about the training, adapted from Khasawneh and Al-Zawahreh [18]. The answers to other questions assessing knowledge, behavior, and study outcomes were dichotomous (yes/ no).…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…115, 116). Respondents for the two studies using university students are each selected from those taking specific courses at a university (e.g., Khasawuheh & Al‐Zawahreh, ), although the nature of the researchers’ relationship with that organization or a possible gatekeeper is not discussed. All but two of the single‐organization studies report the number of respondents, although the size of population from which they are selected is mentioned rarely.…”
Section: Gaining Physical Access In Hrd Survey Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%