2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01232.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using treatment integrity methods to study the implementation process.

Abstract: The last decade has witnessed increased interest in the implementation and dissemination of evidence-based treatments (EBTs) for youth. Nakamura et al. (this issue) detail lessons learned over the past decade from the large-scale implementation of EBTS for children in Hawaii. This commentary discusses how lessons from Hawaii's initiative can help inform the next generation of implementation research. Specifically, we focus on how treatment integrity models and methods designed to characterize core aspects of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implementation research is central to understanding the needs and preferences of clinical providers and can inform dissemination efforts. For example, researchers using the TPOCS-S found that usual care therapists utilize multiple approaches and favor nonbehavioral treatments, such as client-centered therapy (McLeod & Islam, 2011).…”
Section: Direct Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation research is central to understanding the needs and preferences of clinical providers and can inform dissemination efforts. For example, researchers using the TPOCS-S found that usual care therapists utilize multiple approaches and favor nonbehavioral treatments, such as client-centered therapy (McLeod & Islam, 2011).…”
Section: Direct Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study adds to a growing body of literature identifying supported tools that can be used to evaluate trainee comprehension of clinical decision-making in CBT for child anxiety. Whereas measures available to date have either required resource-intensive expert observation of actual practice behavior (McLeod & Islam, 2011) or role-plays (Beidas et al, 2012), or they may be vulnerable to biases inherent in face valid self-reports (Stumpf et al, 2009), this preliminary work on the ACE CARD begins research on brief, low-resource, vignette-based measures of clinical decision-making that requires trainees to apply knowledge to novel case material. Analyses found that the first iteration of the ACE CARD offers moderate utility in discriminating experts in CBT for anxious youth from trainees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demonstrating that school-based personnel, particularly those with less specialized mental health training, can implement EBTs as intended is critical for establishing program effectiveness in community settings and justifying broad implementation (McLeod & Islam, 2011). According to consultants’ judgments, school counselors were highly adherent to the SASS protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%