Volume 1: 39th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2019
DOI: 10.1115/detc2019-97415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Virtual Reality to Test Human-Robot Interaction During a Collaborative Task

Abstract: The use of collaborative robots in the manufacturing industry has widely spread in the last decade. In order to be efficient, the human-robot collaboration needs to be properly designed by also taking into account the operator’s psychophysiological reactions. Virtual Reality can be used as a tool to simulate human-robot collaboration in a safe and cheap way. Here, we present a virtual collaborative platform in which the human operator and a simulated robot coordinate their actions to accomplish a simple assemb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another included study did not find a difference in ECG response between the stress and no stress condition (Eimontaite et al, 2019). Variation in skin conductance level was also evaluated but no significant findings are reported (Etzi et al, 2019). Skin potential reflex features included the amplitude and frequency of response-where higher amplitude and frequency correlated with higher stress (Fujita et al, 2010), (Kato et al, 2010), (Arai et al, 2010), (Tan et al, 2010).…”
Section: Anxiety Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another included study did not find a difference in ECG response between the stress and no stress condition (Eimontaite et al, 2019). Variation in skin conductance level was also evaluated but no significant findings are reported (Etzi et al, 2019). Skin potential reflex features included the amplitude and frequency of response-where higher amplitude and frequency correlated with higher stress (Fujita et al, 2010), (Kato et al, 2010), (Arai et al, 2010), (Tan et al, 2010).…”
Section: Anxiety Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operator manipulation speed has been shown to decrease as anxiety and mental strain increase (Tan et al, 2010), owing to increased cobot movement speeds (Charalambous et al, 2016), (Etzi et al, 2019), (Koppenborg et al, 2017), (Henriksen et al, 2020). The impact of cobot speed was also found to influence the perception of team-fluency, with improved team-fluency when speeds are slower (Koppenborg et al, 2017).…”
Section: System Efficiency and Fluencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those, one is the journal article "Strategic systematic for software development in industry 4.0" (Oliveira Valério et al 2020). Four are conference papers (Arntz and Eimler 2020; H. P. Etzi et al 2019;Metzner, Utsch, et al 2020), specifically "Experiencing AI in VR: A Qualitative Study on Designing a Human-Machine Collaboration Scenario" (Arntz and Eimler 2020), "Use of Virtual Reality in Product Development by Distributed Teams" (H. P. Balzerkiewitz and Stechert 2020), "A system for human-in-the-loop simulation of industrial collaborative robot applications" (Metzner, Utsch, et al 2020) and "Using virtual reality to test human-robot interaction during a collaborative task" (Etzi et al 2019). Four are theses (Gong 2019;Gustavsson 2020; Lloyd Reyson Robles 2020; Tolman 2018).…”
Section: Researchgatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…SS is missing 9 citations from RG and GS. In particular, the Portuguese journal article "Simulação como Tecnologia Habilitadora da Indústria 4.0: Uma Revisão da Literatura" (Randon and Cecconello 2019); three conference papers (Arntz and Eimler 2020; H. P. Etzi et al 2019) that are "Using virtual reality to test human-robot interaction during a collaborative task" (Etzi et al 2019), "Experiencing AI in VR: A Qualitative Study on Designing a Human-Machine Collaboration Scenario" (Arntz and…”
Section: Semantic Scholarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation