2016
DOI: 10.26879/557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using X-ray computed tomography analysis tools to compare the skeletal element morphology of fossil and modern frog (Anura) species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While whole-surface algorithms were developed originally for human faces, it can be applied to any type of surface data where there is a natural correspondence. Regarding full-surface long bone data, they have been studied within comparative anatomy [21], biomedicine [2224] and forensic anthropology (to match paired elements) [25]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While whole-surface algorithms were developed originally for human faces, it can be applied to any type of surface data where there is a natural correspondence. Regarding full-surface long bone data, they have been studied within comparative anatomy [21], biomedicine [2224] and forensic anthropology (to match paired elements) [25]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…crocodilian brain; Witmer et al, 2008), and can be used to assess and quantify differences between extinct and extant taxa (e.g. Dollion et al, 2015;Matthews and du Plessis, 2016). Nevertheless, the technique might not be suitable for all fossils, because successful acquisition of data is limited mainly by the size of the object and density of the surrounding matrix.…”
Section: Palaeobiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After viewing a number of slice images to ensure the selection was done properly, the air was removed. Similarly, each seed is then selected to include its internal air volumes (Matthews and du Plessis 2016). None of this is required for a basic viewing of slice images in a typical non-destructive analysis viewing but for 3D analysis and quantitative volume measurements as reported here.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Time Of Fertilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%