Utility and Access to 3-Dimensional Printing in the Context of Congenital Heart Disease: An International Physician Survey Study

Abstract

Background Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a new technology capable of producing patient-specific 3D cardiac models. Methods A cross-sectional survey of pediatric cardiologists was conducted. Members of the Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Association and Congenital Cardiac Interventional Study Consortium were invited to participate. A questionnaire was distributed using Research Electronic Data Capture between May and September 2019. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Fisher exact test, and odds ratio. Results A total of 71 pediatric cardiologists responded. Some 85% (60/71) agreed that patient-specific 3D printed cardiac models are a beneficial tool in treating children with congenital heart disease (CHD); 80% of those (48/60) believe 3D models facilitate communication with colleagues; 49% (35/71) of respondents had access to 3D printing technology; and 77% (27/35) of those were using models for clinical care. Access differed according to geographic location ( P = 0.004). Of respondents, Americans were 5.5 times more likely (confidence interval, 1.6-19.2) than Canadians to have access to 3D printing technology. The primary reason for lack of access was financial barriers (50%, 18/36). In clinical practice, surgical planning is the primary use of models (96%, 26/27), followed by interventional catheterization planning (52%, 14/27). Double outlet right ventricle was the most commonly modelled lesion (70%, 19/27). Conclusion 3D printing is a new technology that is beneficial in the care of children with CHD. Access to 3D printing varies by geographic location. In pediatric cardiology, 3D models are primarily used for procedural planning for CHD lesions with complex 3D spatial relationships.

The use of 3D-Printed Models in Patient Communication: A Scoping Review

“…In all of the 19 studies feedback and results on the use of 3D models for communication were positive, irrespective of the type of respondent or type of communication. Illmann et al found that of the 85% of clinicians who found benefit from the models, 80% of them believed they would facilitate communication with colleagues and 72% believed they would be useful in communication with parents or families [ 17 ]. In an orthopedics study, patients were asked ‘How much does the CT or 3D-printing model help you to gain a better communication with doctors?’ [ 18 ] and patients in the 3D-printing group rated the 3D-printed model an average of 8.5 compared with 6.5 for those rating the CT scans.…”

Replicating Anatomical Teaching Specimens Using 3D Modeling Embedded Within a Multimodal e-Learning Course: Pre-Post Study Exploring the Impact on Medical Education During COVID-19

“…Technologies discussed in the literature include computer-based learning (eg, videos, animations, multimedia simulation software, 3D models, and 3D computer graphics), 3D printed models, and extended realities (stereoscopic videos, virtual reality, and augmented reality). The tools are valuable teaching and learning aids [ 2 - 13 ] but are underused [ 14 ].…”

Virtual Reality Treatment Planning for Congenital Heart Disease

“…All that said, 3D printing is not universally available and can be expensive ( 11 ). Emerging technology allows visualization of complex cardiac anatomy virtually without the need for 3D printing ( 12 ).…”