2010
DOI: 10.3171/2009.10.peds09159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of a cervical spine clearance protocol after trauma in children between 0 and 3 years of age

Abstract: Object Cervical spine clearance after trauma in children 0–3 years of age is deceptively difficult. Young children may not be able to communicate effectively, and severe injuries may require intubation and sedation. Currently, no published guidelines are available to aid in decision-making in these complex situations. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a safe and effective protocol-driven system could be developed for clearance of the cervical spine i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anderson et al [18] devised a cervical spine clearance protocol specifically for children between 0 and 3 years of age. Their plan utilized some form of routine radiographic imaging combined with a thorough physical and neurological examination and, if applicable, neurosurgical input.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anderson et al [18] devised a cervical spine clearance protocol specifically for children between 0 and 3 years of age. Their plan utilized some form of routine radiographic imaging combined with a thorough physical and neurological examination and, if applicable, neurosurgical input.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, somatosensory evoked potential monitoring was used during flexion-extension radiographs in a prospective study of 15 obtunded pediatric patients with inconclusive results [27]. Other recent work has focused on trauma protocols to either identify injuries or clear the cervical spine in children 0 to 3 years of age [2,23]. None of these studies, however, addresses the specific issue of determining the best radiographic protocol to clear the cervical spine in the obtunded or comatose pediatric trauma patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient inclusion criteria for the study were as follows: (1) Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less after hemodynamic stabilization; (2) admitted to the intensive care unit; (3) greater than 2 weeks of age and less than 17 years of age; and (4) suspected or known traumatic cervical spine injury. The patient exclusion criteria included: (1) inability to obtain plain radiographs, CT, or MR imaging within 7 days of the patient's admission to the hospital (later amended to 10 days); (2) inability to obtain follow-up plain cervical spine radiographs 3-4 months after injury; or 3) isolated gunshot or penetrating wound to the head with little chance of cervical spine injury.…”
Section: Clinical Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4,21,28,34,36,39 Clearing the spine of suspected injury is especially difficult in children because spine injuries are uncommon in this age group, children are often noncommunicative, and many normal variants are found in the pediatric spine, such as pseudosubluxation, synchondroses, and incomplete ossification. Recent studies have expanded the use of clinical decision rules, such as NEXUS and the Canadian C-spine Rule, to the pediatric population.…”
Section: Ct Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many published reports of new protocols devised to assess the pediatric cervical spine have been vague in their criteria or have used adult parameters. 2,3,7,12,26 This study aims to develop normal values, in a very preliminary fashion, for selected anatomical relationships in the pediatric upper cervical spine. Using these early numbers as a stepping stone, along with studies of their reliability, we hope to begin the process of establishing truly valid, reliable normal estimates for these measurements in children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%