2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-006-0356-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 and 16S mitochondrial DNA sequences for species identification and phylogenetic inference within the Rhinonyssus coniventris species complex (Acari: Rhinonyssidae)

Abstract: The complete internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), 5.8S rDNA, and ITS2 region of the ribosomal DNA and a 390-bp region of the 16S rDNA gene from five taxa belonging to Rhinonyssus (Rhinonyssus vanellus, Rhinonyssus tringae, Rhinonyssus neglectus, Rhinonyssus echinipes from Kentish plover, and Rhinonyssus echinipes from grey plover) were sequenced to examine the level of sequence variation and the taxonomic levels to show utility in phylogeny estimation. Our data show that these molecular markers can help to di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in spite of the utility of 16S rDNA to solve taxonomic and phylogenetic questions between closely related species, such as those included in Rhinonyssus coniventris complex (de Rojas et al 2007), our results show that 16S mitochondrial rDNA does not seem to be a good marker for comparisons at the population level in this group of mites.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…However, in spite of the utility of 16S rDNA to solve taxonomic and phylogenetic questions between closely related species, such as those included in Rhinonyssus coniventris complex (de Rojas et al 2007), our results show that 16S mitochondrial rDNA does not seem to be a good marker for comparisons at the population level in this group of mites.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…The entire ITS fragment of D. gallinae amplified from each sample using primers ITSDGF and ITSDGR was approximately 500 bp in length (Fig. 2), as reported by de Rojas et al (2007). In no case was product amplified from no-DNA sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Furthermore, detailed morphological descriptions of the immature stages remain unknown for most tick species. To circumvent somehow these kinds of difficulties, several approaches using different genetic makers have been evaluated for the identification and phylogenetic studies of ticks (Wesson et al 1993;McLain et al 1995;Zahler and Gothe 1997;Poucher et al 1999;Fukunaga et al 2000;Hlinka et al 2002;Shaw et al 2002;Rees et al 2003;de Rojas et al 2007;Marrelli et al 2007). Concerning the public health aspects, molecular methods applied to the diagnosis of ticks can be useful and practical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the rRNA genes which are highly conserved between closely related species, the spacer regions (ITS1 and ITS2) are subject to higher evolutionary rates and are therefore more variable in their lengths and nucleotide composition (Hillis and Dixon, 1991). These regions have therefore been used for the discrimination of closely related species and subspecies, and in the description of new species (Zahler et al, 1998;Holman et al, 2003;Lew et al, 2003;Aktas et al, 2007;de Rojas et al, 2007;Hilpertshauser et al, 2007;Saito-Ito et al, 2008;Niu et al, 2009;Bosman et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%