2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of Prechemotherapy Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function for Patients With Lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used these defined risk factors to develop a risk score (RS) which was then correlated with the obtained LVEF. Previous studies show the frequency of an abnormal LVEF ranged from 2.5% to 13.4%, while the percentage of patients in which chemotherapy plan changed was only 0%‐2.8% . In one of recent study by Truong et al, where 600 patients were studies, baseline LVEF assessment rarely changed the treatment plan in patients with no cardiac risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used these defined risk factors to develop a risk score (RS) which was then correlated with the obtained LVEF. Previous studies show the frequency of an abnormal LVEF ranged from 2.5% to 13.4%, while the percentage of patients in which chemotherapy plan changed was only 0%‐2.8% . In one of recent study by Truong et al, where 600 patients were studies, baseline LVEF assessment rarely changed the treatment plan in patients with no cardiac risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous studies show the frequency of an abnormal LVEF ranged from 2.5% to 13.4%, while the percentage of patients in which chemotherapy plan changed was only 0%-2.8%. 11,[33][34][35][36][37][38] The results of our study should be carefully interpreted, considering it being a single institute retrospective analysis. Given the low prevalence of baseline reduced LVEF and skew toward low-risk individuals with ≤2 risk factors (74% of study population), risk score derived from 26 clinical variables in an overfitted model could underestimate risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the utility of this approach has been debated due to a low prevalence of asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, with this strategy missing most patients that will ultimately have cardiotoxicity (62). Serum biomarkers may be useful in predicting cardiotoxicity and the role of baseline assessment of serum biomarkers prior to cancer treatment in predicting cardiotoxicity is being evaluated (63).…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current diagnostic methods of myocardial damage used in clinic include electrocardiograph (ECG), Doppler echocardiography, brain natriuretic peptide, cardiac troponin-T, and creatine kinase-MB fraction levels. [ 6 , 7 ] Among these, ECG has the best cost performance and is most commonly used. For patients with acute or subacute myocardial damage which usually caused by edema of myocardial cells and myocardial cell vacuolar degeneration, the ECG manifested with nonspecific ST-T (ST segment-T wave) alternations, lowing and flatting of QRS wave (QRS complex), and prolongation of QT interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%