2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of self-report and performance-based measures of risk for predicting driving behavior in young people

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are also informative in terms of one of the initial goals of the BART, which was to identify risk takers (Lejuez et al, , , Pleskac et al, ). Whereas the BART is often found to correlate with risk taking outside the lab (e.g., Aklin et al, ; Hopko et al, ; Lejuez et al, , ; Skeel et al, ), there are also reports that the BART can have limited convergent validity with other behavioral measures or risk taking (Frey et al, ; Pedroni, Frey, Bruhin, Dutilh, Hertwig, & Rieskamp, ), as well as with self‐reported measures of real‐life behaviors (e.g., Ba, Peng, Salvendy, & Crundall, ; Coffey, Schumacher, Baschnagel, Hawk, & Holloman, ; Frey et al, ; Le Bas, Hughes, & Stout, ; van Ravenzwaaij, Dutilh, & Wagenmakers, ). Our results suggest that to a certain degree, these somewhat inconsistent results could be due to particular task designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are also informative in terms of one of the initial goals of the BART, which was to identify risk takers (Lejuez et al, , , Pleskac et al, ). Whereas the BART is often found to correlate with risk taking outside the lab (e.g., Aklin et al, ; Hopko et al, ; Lejuez et al, , ; Skeel et al, ), there are also reports that the BART can have limited convergent validity with other behavioral measures or risk taking (Frey et al, ; Pedroni, Frey, Bruhin, Dutilh, Hertwig, & Rieskamp, ), as well as with self‐reported measures of real‐life behaviors (e.g., Ba, Peng, Salvendy, & Crundall, ; Coffey, Schumacher, Baschnagel, Hawk, & Holloman, ; Frey et al, ; Le Bas, Hughes, & Stout, ; van Ravenzwaaij, Dutilh, & Wagenmakers, ). Our results suggest that to a certain degree, these somewhat inconsistent results could be due to particular task designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Não obstante, a impulsividade tem sido associada às decisões desvantajosas no IGT, porque dificulta a aprendizagem, torna os indivíduos mais sensíveis à recompensa e é um sintoma de outras perturbações associadas ao mau desempenho na tarefa (Cackowski et al, 2014;Davis, Patte, Tweed, & Curtis, 2007;Kertzman, Kagan, Vainder, Lapidus, & Weizman, 2013;Takano, Takahashi, Tanaka, & Hironaka, 2010;Upton, Bishara, Ahn, & Stout, 2011;Stevens et al, 2015). A investigação sobre a importância dessa variável no desempenho no IGT, no entanto, tem mostrado resultados inconsistentes (Davis et al, 2007;Le Bas, Hughes, & Stout, 2015;Upton et al, 2011), particularmente em amostras não clínicas Goudriaan, Grekin, & Sher, 2007;Penolazzi, Leone, & Russo, 2013), podendo inclusive estar relacionada com os ciclos menstruais / balanços hormonais (Derntl, Pintzinger, Kryspin-Exner, &, Schöpf, 2014, Evans & Hampson, 2014Iannello, Biassoni, Nelli, Zugno, & Colombo, 2015) ou até perceções subjetivas de fome (de Ridder, Kroese, Adriaanse, &Evers, 2014).…”
Section: Igt E Personalidadeunclassified
“…Thus, decision making represents an interesting topic in the field of road safety. For instance, a number of studies ( French et al, 1993 ; Farah et al, 2008 ; Lev et al, 2008 ; Le Bas et al, 2015 ; Ba et al, 2016 ) have tried to investigate the link between non-contextual decision making and the task-specific decision-making skills involved in driving behaviors. Farah et al (2008) used a driving simulator to assess the association between driving behavior and IGT performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, mixed findings were reported when risky driving was measured through questionnaires. For instance Ba et al (2016) found that riskier drivers tended to pick cards from decks in which the penalties were small (although more frequent) in the IGT, independently from the overall net gain, whereas Le Bas et al (2015) failed in founding relations between IGT performance and on-road risky behaviors. One limitation of the IGT that could explain the inconsistency in the data is the fact that participants’ personality and mood seem to affect their performance in the IGT as well ( Buelow and Suhr, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation