1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02425938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of SPECT imaging for determination of vertebral metastases in patients with known primary tumors

Abstract: Determining the etiology of a focal lesion seen on bone scan in patients with primary tumors usually requires the use of other imaging procedures or biopsy. Single positron emission computed tomography (SPECT) with high resolution multidetector systems can localize the specific site of a vertebral lesion and in this way potentially differentiate between benign and metastatic disease. SPECT images of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine were reviewed for lesion location and intensity by two experienced interpret… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have reported improved diagnostic accuracy with the addition of SPECT, particularly in the vertebral column through improved tracer localisation [20][21][22]. As a general rule, uptake in the vertebral body or the pedicle alone is more likely to represent malignant disease than a pattern of uptake isolated to the vertebral body periphery or at the facet joints [23,24]. However, even with SPECT, spatial resolution is often insufficient for precise localisation of bone lesions, and correlation with anatomical imaging is often required.…”
Section: Applications In Musculoskeletal Radiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported improved diagnostic accuracy with the addition of SPECT, particularly in the vertebral column through improved tracer localisation [20][21][22]. As a general rule, uptake in the vertebral body or the pedicle alone is more likely to represent malignant disease than a pattern of uptake isolated to the vertebral body periphery or at the facet joints [23,24]. However, even with SPECT, spatial resolution is often insufficient for precise localisation of bone lesions, and correlation with anatomical imaging is often required.…”
Section: Applications In Musculoskeletal Radiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the previous studies evaluating the additional value of SPECT, however, showed a significantly higher increase in lesion detection rates by SPECT compared to planar imaging [2,3,5,6,8,10]. Han et al [6] compared Looking at the impact of SPECT, SPECT-based patient staging differed from the planar staging in 26.6% of all our 271 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The results from prospective trials might not be applicable to clinical routine, because these trials included highly selected patient collectives which are not representative for everyday clinical routine. Only few studies have evaluated the value of additional SPECT in unselected patients from clinical routine [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], all of them with rather small sample sizes. Some of these studies reported the fraction of lesions missed in planar images but detected by SPECT to be significant (20.1-25.6%) [5,6], while other authors found this fraction to be rather small (4.3%) [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spinal abnormalities involving the vertebral body or the pedicle alone are more likely to represent malignant disease compared with abnormalities confined to the periphery of the body or facet joint (30)(31)(32). Although the majority of bone metastases appear as hot spots, some appear as cold lesions.…”
Section: Musculoskeletal Imagingmentioning
confidence: 98%