2022
DOI: 10.1002/pc.26580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of discarded Cymbopogon flexuosus root waste as a novel lignocellulosic fiber for lightweight polymer composite application

Abstract: The viability of using cellulosic Cymbopogon flexuosus root (CFR) fiber waste from the industry as a reinforcing material in a polyester-reinforced composite was investigated. Initially, CFR anatomy, mechanical, thermal, physio-chemical, morphological, and spectroscopy behaviors were investigated. Spectroscopy and chemical analysis were evidence for the richness of cellulose content (74.33%) in the fiber which reflected in increased tensile strength of 315.22 ± 61.72 MPa and thermal stability 272.31 C. Fiber r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A sample's impact strength is determined by factors such as the matrix's toughness, fiber surface morphology, fiber quality (absence of defects), and fiber and matrix crystallinity. [ 2 ] Alkali‐treated composites (TMAPFC) had higher impact strength compared to untreated fiber (Figure 5). The impact strength of MAPFs/epoxy composites was improved by adding up to 20% fibers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample's impact strength is determined by factors such as the matrix's toughness, fiber surface morphology, fiber quality (absence of defects), and fiber and matrix crystallinity. [ 2 ] Alkali‐treated composites (TMAPFC) had higher impact strength compared to untreated fiber (Figure 5). The impact strength of MAPFs/epoxy composites was improved by adding up to 20% fibers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conrad method was appropriate to determine the percentage of wax, and ash content was calculated as per the procedure described by Indran et al in 2014 17 . The measure taken to appraise moisture content was the weight difference between undried and dried fibers determined before and after treated at 80°C for 360 min in an oven 23 . The statistical formula used to calculate moisture content is given as the relation Equation ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The measure taken to appraise moisture content was the weight difference between undried and dried fibers determined before and after treated at 80 C for 360 min in an oven. 23 The statistical formula used to calculate moisture content is given as the relation Equation (2). Where, W1 corresponds the weight of undried fiber containing moisture and W2 represents the mass of moisture removed, dried fiber.…”
Section: Analysis Of Chemical Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where, “K'” denotes Scherer's constant (0.89), “ β ” indicates full‐width at half‐maximum, “λ” specifies the intensity of radiation, and “ θ ” implies the Bragg's angle. [ 5 ] CI=1IamI002×100% CS=italicKλβcosθ …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Followed by, kinetic activation energy of EFLF was calculated according to Broido's plot, by using Broido's equation given below Equation (). [ 5 ] In this relation, “y” specifies the standardized weight ( w t / w i ), “ R ” stands for the universal gas constant (8.314 KJ/ mol), “ K ” represents the reaction constant, and “ T ” embodies the temperature at a specific time in Kelvin. [ 62 ] ε=lnln1y=ER1T+K …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%