2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing eye movements: Overcoming inaccuracy while tracking the focus of attention during reading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Calibration Mechanism: There is a need to account for error in recorded gaze location as it has been documented that eye trackers can lose precision during periods of use (Hyrskykari, 2006). We propose using the calibration techniques described by Hyrskykari (2006).…”
Section: Adaptive Text Presentation Based On Eye Gazementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Calibration Mechanism: There is a need to account for error in recorded gaze location as it has been documented that eye trackers can lose precision during periods of use (Hyrskykari, 2006). We propose using the calibration techniques described by Hyrskykari (2006).…”
Section: Adaptive Text Presentation Based On Eye Gazementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In iDict several sources of information are used to make the detection of comprehension difficulties as accurate as possible. To compensate for the inherent inaccuracy of eye tracking the measured point of gaze is algorithmically corrected [31]. An 'index of difficulty' in comprehending words in a piece of text is defined based on metrics associated with gaze behaviour [32].…”
Section: Detecting Reading Comprehension Difficultiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al 1996;Lankford 2000;Ashmore and Duchowski 2005;Kumar et al 2007], using semantic information acquired from the application to correct the inaccuracy, e.g. [Salvucci and Anderson 2000;Beymer et al 2005;Hyrskykari 2006] or using additional operations to refine the inaccurate gaze point, e.g. [Zhai et al 1999;Yamato et al 2000;Miniotas et al 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%