2013
DOI: 10.1080/00909882.2013.859292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing “On Tap” Experts in Deliberative Forums: Implications for Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors suggest this can lead to issues of legitimacy of decision-making and information. The need for technical experts to be mindful of their interaction with communities is also highlighted by the case of a water scarcity forum in north Colorado, where it was found that uninvited interjections by water authorities stifled deliberative processes (Sprain, Carcasson, & Merolla, 2014). The authors believe training and careful planning can overcome this challenge.…”
Section: Communication Campaignsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors suggest this can lead to issues of legitimacy of decision-making and information. The need for technical experts to be mindful of their interaction with communities is also highlighted by the case of a water scarcity forum in north Colorado, where it was found that uninvited interjections by water authorities stifled deliberative processes (Sprain, Carcasson, & Merolla, 2014). The authors believe training and careful planning can overcome this challenge.…”
Section: Communication Campaignsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the mentioned strategies, for instance, formulations, editing and reframing are also evident in the work of other third parties such as facilitators and judges of small claim courts (Black and Wiederhold, 2014;Sprain et al, 2014;van der Houwen, 2009).…”
Section: Research On Mediation Identifies a Range Of Communication Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, facilitators of public deliberation frame issues as contentious to terminate the discussion on aspects that cannot be resolved (Sprain et al, 2014). In their turn, judges use different types of formulations (e.g., checking formulations, bridging formulations, legal formulations, and judgment formulations) to constrain and develop subsequent interaction (van der Houwen, 2009).…”
Section: Research On Mediation Identifies a Range Of Communication Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, interactants can use shifts in footing as a resource to address disagreement in an indirect way while avoiding conflict (Bonito & Sanders, 2002) or stay neutral (McVittie et al, 2011). Other strategies to shape disagreement space include limiting topical potential by the use of questions or introducing issues to discuss (Bilmes, 2001;Greco Morasso, 2011;Maoz & Ellis, 2001;Vasilyeva, 2012a), activities of giving an opinion and telling a story (Schiffrin, 1990), providing accounts for one's actions and expressing agreement with an opponent (Vasilyeva, 2016b), and use of formulations, editing, framing, and reframing (Black & Wiederhold, 2014;Putnam, 2009;Sprain et al, 2014;van der Houwen, 2009). …”
Section: Conflict and Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%