Utilizing the Total Design Method in medicine: maximizing response rates in long, non-incentivized, personal questionnaire postal surveys

Abstract

IntroductionMaximizing response rates in questionnaires can improve their validity and quality by reducing non-response bias. A comprehensive analysis is essential for producing reasonable conclusions in patient-reported outcome research particularly for topics of a sensitive nature. This often makes long (≥7 pages) questionnaires necessary but these have been shown to reduce response rates in mail surveys. Our work adapted the “Total Design Method,” initially produced for commercial markets, to raise response rates in a long (total: 11 pages, 116 questions), non-incentivized, very personal postal survey sent to almost 350 women.Patients and methodsA total of 346 women who had undergone mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction from 2008–2014 (inclusive) at Addenbrooke’s University Hospital were sent our study pack (Breast-Q satisfaction questionnaire and support documents) using our modified “Total Design Method.” Participants were sent packs and reminders according to our designed schedule.ResultsOf the 346 participants, we received 258 responses, an overall response rate of 74.5% with a useable response rate of 72.3%. One hundred and six responses were received before the week 1 reminder (30.6%), 120 before week 3 (34.6%), 225 before the week 7 reminder (64.6%) and the remainder within 3 weeks of the final pack being sent. The median age of patients that the survey was sent to, and the median age of the respondents, was 54 years.ConclusionIn this study, we have demonstrated the successful implementation of a novel approach to postal surveys. Despite the length of the questionnaire (nine pages, 116 questions) and limitations of expenses to mail a survey to ~350 women, we were able to attain a response rate of 74.6%.

Attitudes of optometrists towards artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of retinal disease: A cross‐sectional mail‐out survey

“…Given 5908 practising optometrists in Australia, 14 a minimum sample size of 126 participants was calculated to provide 95% certainty around a 10% margin of error on the primary outcome question soliciting attitudes towards the use of AI for diagnosing retinal disease. 15 Based on a literature‐derived expectation of a 50% response rate, 10 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 a random sample of 252 optometrists were invited to participate in the study.…”

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Autologous Fat Grafting in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

“…A low response rate can cause a nonrespondent bias that needs to be improved, 25,26 as we have previously reported with regard to sexual health 14 . Some studies have identified cultural differences in sexuality between Western and Asian people based on a culture of suppressed sexual attitudes that prevents expression of thoughts about sex 27–29 .…”

Breast reconstruction and the COVID-19 pandemic: Adapting practice

“…Moreover, the response rate might have been higher with use of the Total Design Method permitting a more representative cross-sectional sample. 4 Nonetheless, more than 500 surgeons belonging to the Brazilian Society of Mastology submitted responses and presumably these were a mixture of plastic and breast oncological surgeons.…”