2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10971-006-0201-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV assisted pyrolysis of solution deposited BiFeO3 multiferroic thin films. Effects on microstructure and functional properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(e) and (c)]; therefore, we attributed the formation of ( l 00)‐oriented texture to the effects of the accumulated Bi and/or Fe species at the Pt/BFO interface. Because the BiFeO 3 on top of the Fe 2 O 3 buffer layer (not shown here) did not show a (100)‐preferred orientation, the existence of Bi–O interface layer could be responsible of high a ‐axis orientations . The same effect has been also observed on the stoichiometric BiFeO 3 thin films processed on Pt substrate using UV‐assisted pyrolysis and has been related to the effect of UV on the formation of template layer which favors the above orientation .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(e) and (c)]; therefore, we attributed the formation of ( l 00)‐oriented texture to the effects of the accumulated Bi and/or Fe species at the Pt/BFO interface. Because the BiFeO 3 on top of the Fe 2 O 3 buffer layer (not shown here) did not show a (100)‐preferred orientation, the existence of Bi–O interface layer could be responsible of high a ‐axis orientations . The same effect has been also observed on the stoichiometric BiFeO 3 thin films processed on Pt substrate using UV‐assisted pyrolysis and has been related to the effect of UV on the formation of template layer which favors the above orientation .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…attributed the (100) preferential orientation of 10% Bi‐excess BiFeO 3 to the lattice matching between (111)‐Pt and film . However (111)‐BiFeO 3 plane was also reported to match well with the (111)‐Pt ( d 111 = 0.227 nm for Pt and d 111 = 0.228 nm for BiFeO 3 ) . The seeding effect of Pt substrate was excluded in our case because the BFO without any accumulation of Bi at Pt/BFO interface did not have such a texture structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…2͒. Nondoped BFO has been presented elsewhere, 4,5 and was shown to be characterized by large grains, approximately 500 nm in size. Although the annealing temperature of BFO-LMO is higher, the mean grain size is decreased which might be attributed to solute effects on grain growth known for many systems in standard textbooks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In pure BFO, the leakage current mechanism seems to be governed by deep ionized traps purportedly due to the existence of Fe 2+ species. 5,7 Stabilizing the Fe 3+ ions would therefore help improve the resistivity of BFO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habouti et al reported substantial improvement in leakage resistance for their sol-gel BiFeO 3 films deposited with assistance of UV pyrolysis (UVP) [84]. Compared to the BiFeO 3 films deposited with no UV pyrolysis (NP), the UVP films had better crystallinity as inferred from the stronger intensities of the peaks in diffractogram.…”
Section: Chemical Solution Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%