2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV/H2O2 treatment of Rhodamine B in aqueous solution: Influence of operational parameters and kinetic modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
65
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH decreased over the treatment period and the final values ranged from 4.7 to 6.5 (no data shown). This behavior was also reported by other authors (Braun and Oliveros 2002;Daneshvar et al 2008;Georgiou et al 2002;Zhou et al 2012), and it is probably related to the formation of acid species during oxidation process. Figure 7 clearly shows the reduction of residual COD as the [H 2 O 2 ]/COD ratio increases.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Uv-h 2 O 2 Processsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The pH decreased over the treatment period and the final values ranged from 4.7 to 6.5 (no data shown). This behavior was also reported by other authors (Braun and Oliveros 2002;Daneshvar et al 2008;Georgiou et al 2002;Zhou et al 2012), and it is probably related to the formation of acid species during oxidation process. Figure 7 clearly shows the reduction of residual COD as the [H 2 O 2 ]/COD ratio increases.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Uv-h 2 O 2 Processsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The effect of EE 2 concentration on the degradation rate was mainly due to the absorption of UV radiation by EE 2 molecules [28]. At high EE 2 concentrations, the penetration of photons entering into the solution decreased, so that an inner filter effect was induced and hence the solution became more and more impermeable to UV radiation [29]. Consequently, hydroxyl radical concentration decreased and EE 2 degradation rate reduced.…”
Section: Effect Of the Initial Ee 2 Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a figure-of-merit, electric energy per order (EE/O) was used to evaluate the cost efficiency of the optimum degradation process [29]. EE/O is the electrical energy (in kWh) required to degrade organic pollutant by one order of magnitude in 1000 US gal (3785 L) of water.…”
Section: Model Validation and Experimental Confirmationmentioning
confidence: 99%