2016
DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s95249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV photofunctionalization promotes nano-biomimetic apatite deposition on titanium

Abstract: Background Although biomimetic apatite coating is a promising way to provide titanium with osteoconductivity, the efficiency and quality of deposition is often poor. Most titanium implants have microscale surface morphology, and an addition of nanoscale features while preserving the micromorphology may provide further biological benefit. Here, we examined the effect of ultraviolet (UV) light treatment of titanium, or photofunctionalization, on the efficacy of biomimetic apatite deposition on titan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sr‐incorporated surfaces with such nanoparticle coatings indeed showed super‐hydrophilic properties in our study, which was in accordance with the above reports. It is believed that super‐hydrophilic surfaces would not only enhance cell attachment, spreading, settling and subsequent proliferation and differentiation in vitro (Lorenzetti et al, ; Ogawa et al, ) but also be good for early osseointegration with dental implants in vivo compared with hydrophobic surfaces (Hicklin et al, ; Minamikawa et al, ; Vasak et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sr‐incorporated surfaces with such nanoparticle coatings indeed showed super‐hydrophilic properties in our study, which was in accordance with the above reports. It is believed that super‐hydrophilic surfaces would not only enhance cell attachment, spreading, settling and subsequent proliferation and differentiation in vitro (Lorenzetti et al, ; Ogawa et al, ) but also be good for early osseointegration with dental implants in vivo compared with hydrophobic surfaces (Hicklin et al, ; Minamikawa et al, ; Vasak et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercialized implant bodies are often roughened to enhance osseointegratio n [12,18,34,42,[69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79], where acid treatment is the most common surface treatment method [4,7,9,[80][81][82][83]. The surface-treated implant body is subsequently packaged dry or in solution (e.g., water or saline solution) before transportation and storage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is a negative impact of temperature fluctuations, a potential countermeasure should be explored. Recent studies revealed that ultraviolet (UV) light treatment of titanium restored its superhydrophilicity after aging/storage [19,[31][32][33][34][35][36]. UV treatment has also been reported to remove surface impurities (e.g., hydrocarbons) [32,[37][38][39][40], thereby enhancing the biological activity of titanium for osteoblasts and bone [15,16,19,20,25,28,31,[33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, UVA demonstrated a lower reduction in carbon content, lower hydrophilicity induction capacity and fewer antimicrobial effects than UVC [19,45,53,56]. Furthermore, most in-vitro and in-vivo studies that used Hg-vapor lamps in UVC photofunctionalization not only shown an increase in the osteoblastic activity in the early healing periods, but also a transformation in the wettability behavior from hydrophobic to superhydrophilic and antibacterial effects [45,[57][58][59][60][61]. Nevertheless, contrary to all the aforementioned papers, some research works do not observe significant effects of BIC and ISQ on photofunctionalized titanium dental implants after 9 months in minipigs [62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%