2009
DOI: 10.1002/dac.1086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UW‐MAC: An underwater sensor network MAC protocol

Abstract: Abstract-As over 70 percent of the earth's surface is covered by water, it is desirable to deploy underwater sensor networks to support oceanic research. Under Water Sensor Networks (UWSNs) use acoustic waves and are characterized by long and variable propagation delays, intermittent connectivity, limited bandwidth and low bit rates. Energy savings have always been the primary concern in wireless sensor network protocols; however there are applications where latency and throughput are prioritized over energy e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the limited available bandwidth in underwater acoustic channels, FDMA was not suitable for UWSN [2]. The second type of code-division protocol, usually used in inner-cluster UWSN for communications, includes HRMAC [3] and UW-MAC [4]. The last type, time based protocol, is the most developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the limited available bandwidth in underwater acoustic channels, FDMA was not suitable for UWSN [2]. The second type of code-division protocol, usually used in inner-cluster UWSN for communications, includes HRMAC [3] and UW-MAC [4]. The last type, time based protocol, is the most developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the first type, there are protocols based on three multiple access techniques such as FDMA, 11 TDMA, [12][13][14] and CDMA. 15,16 The second protocols type are classified into random access and handshaking protocols that have the advantage of using the full bandwidth of the communication channel. Carrier sense multiple access (CSMA) 17 and ALOHA 18 represent the same type of those protocols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In high traffic scenarios, packet collisions of MUASNs not only severely degrade network throughput, but also cause intolerably long latency due to uncertain number of retransmissions. On the other hand, contention-free MAC protocols [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] are significantly superior to contention-based ones in high traffic scenarios because the medium is orthogonalized in a certain domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%