Vacancy-vacancy effective interaction in the bulk and on the surface of a simple solid

Abstract

The electronic contribution to the effective, indirect, vacancy-vacancy interaction in the bulk and on the surface of a simple-cubic' tight-binding solid is evaluated. The analysis is performed within a one-electron picture using a Green's-function technique. The intervacancy interaction is shown to be significant up to about fourth-nearest neighbors, and to have an oscillatory dependence on their separation. The nearest-neighbor interaction is found to be negative for both bulk and surface vacancies. The behavior of surface vacancies appears qualitatively similar to those in the bulk, although their interaction is found to be stronger in most cases. It is shown that vacancies, both in the bulk and on the surface, have the thermodynamic tendency of forming nearest-neighbor dimers, and that the diffusion process leading to the formation of these dimers occurs along preferred routes. These preferred routes should, in principle, be observable for surface vacancies.

Modelling of transition and noble metal vicinal surfaces: energetics, vibrations and stability

“…Finally oscillatory electronic interactions of the Friedel type (i.e., arising from the interference between electron density oscillations around steps which have been visualized by STM [47]) should also be present similarly to those existing between chemisorbed atoms or defects [48,49] but they have attracted little attention, at least up to now. Such interactions have been invoked by Frohn et al [50] to explain their STM observations on Cu(11 n).…”

On x-ray channelling in microcapillaries and nanocapillaries

“…Charge transfers in the vicinity of the steps produce a dipoledipole interaction (repulsive or attractive) varying also as 1/d 2 . Finally oscillatory electronic interactions of the Friedel type (i.e., arising from the interference between electron density oscillations around steps which have been visualized by STM [47]) should also be present similarly to those existing between chemisorbed atoms or defects [48,49] but they have attracted little attention, at least up to now. Such interactions have been invoked by Frohn et al [50] to explain their STM observations on Cu(11n).…”