2010
DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-6-35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccination with attenuated Salmonella enterica Dublin expressing E coli O157:H7 outer membrane protein Intimin induces transient reduction of fecal shedding of E coli O157:H7 in cattle

Abstract: BackgroundEscherichia coli serogroup O157:H7 has emerged as an important zoonotic bacterial pathogen, causing a range of symptoms from self-limiting bloody diarrhea to severe hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic-uremic syndrome in humans. Beef and dairy cattle are considered the most important animal reservoirs for this pathogen. One of the important virulence characteristics of E. coli O157:H7 is the eaeA gene encoding the 97 kDa surface protein intimin. Intimin is required for attachment and effacement during t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to examine whether our vaccine constructs were excreted into feces, we attempted to detect the strains in fecal samples taken from randomly selected mice in each immunization group (n=5 per group). The vaccine strain was not detected in any of the fecal samples, suggesting that it may not be excreted in feces and therefore may not contaminate the environment unlike the previous studied candidate [21]. Adverse reactions such as diarrhea and weight loss were not observed in any of the groups during the experimental period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to examine whether our vaccine constructs were excreted into feces, we attempted to detect the strains in fecal samples taken from randomly selected mice in each immunization group (n=5 per group). The vaccine strain was not detected in any of the fecal samples, suggesting that it may not be excreted in feces and therefore may not contaminate the environment unlike the previous studied candidate [21]. Adverse reactions such as diarrhea and weight loss were not observed in any of the groups during the experimental period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Khare et al [21] also reported that intimin-expressing S. Dublin strain was shed in feces of vaccinated calves till 28 days post prime oral immunization. In order to examine whether our vaccine constructs were excreted into feces, we attempted to detect the strains in fecal samples taken from randomly selected mice in each immunization group (n=5 per group).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both induced humoral immunity in calves but did not protect against colonisation by E. coli O157 upon subsequent challenge (van Diemen et al, 2007). A recent study showed that inoculation with a recombinant S. Dublin strain expressing E. coli O157 intimin reduced enteric colonisation and faecal shedding of E. coli O157 in calves, although it did not correspond with the presence of intiminspecific IgA in faeces (Khare et al, 2010). Another study examined vaccines containing E. coli O157 type III secreted proteins and it was found that faecal shedding and duration of shedding was reduced (Potter et al, 2004) but a subsequent field trial in feedlot cattle showed no significant association between pen prevalence of faecal E. coli O157 and vaccination (Van Donkersgoed et al, 2005).…”
Section: Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These models include formulations based on recombinant expression of virulence factors, 2226 culture supernatants from virulent strains grown under conditions promoting virulence factor secretion, 27 , 28 subunits or components directly extracted from STEC strains, 2931 and heterologous expression of STEC virulence factors in both attenuated and unrelated bacteria. 32 Due to the complex mechanism responsible for colonization, it is not surprising that protection has only been observed for multi-antigenic formulations. Noteworthy, as anti-STEC vaccination in domestic cattle will not bring any economic benefit to cattle breeders, keeping the cost per dose of candidates as low as possible is mandatory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%