2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12939-022-01678-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccine equity in low and middle income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background Evidence to date has shown that inequality in health, and vaccination coverage in particular, can have ramifications to wider society. However, whilst individual studies have sought to characterise these heterogeneities in immunisation coverage at national level, few have taken a broad and quantitative view of the contributing factors to heterogeneity in immunisation coverage and impact, i.e. the number of cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years averted. This systematic rev… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
71
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
5
71
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zero-dose children are defined by the Immunisation Agenda 2030 consortium (IA2030) as those that lack access to or are never reached by routine immunization services, measured by the lack of the first dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis containing vaccine (DTP1) [ 2 ]. Health inequities are significant drivers of the gaps in immunization coverage and challenges in reaching the most under-served communities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [ 3 , 4 ]. It is estimated that half of zero-dose children reside in three key geographic contexts: urban poor areas, remote communities and conflict-affected settings [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zero-dose children are defined by the Immunisation Agenda 2030 consortium (IA2030) as those that lack access to or are never reached by routine immunization services, measured by the lack of the first dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis containing vaccine (DTP1) [ 2 ]. Health inequities are significant drivers of the gaps in immunization coverage and challenges in reaching the most under-served communities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [ 3 , 4 ]. It is estimated that half of zero-dose children reside in three key geographic contexts: urban poor areas, remote communities and conflict-affected settings [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that half of zero-dose children reside in three key geographic contexts: urban poor areas, remote communities and conflict-affected settings [ 5 ]. Moreover, gender-related barriers to immunization create additional challenges, with indicators such as maternal education and age being significant determinants of immunization coverage [ 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, inequality in access to healthcare services was a major challenge in low- and middle-income countries [ 7 ]. Amid the pandemic, these countries experienced significant barriers related to lack of testing available, protective personal equipment, advanced healthcare services, as well as the global vaccine supply inequities [ 8 , 9 ]. Therefore, the pandemic exacerbating the challenges of health inequities in poor communities resulting in new waves of negative socio-economic consequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of the global population of children with an incomplete vaccination series reside in LMICs (7). Several factors contribute to low rates of vaccine uptake in LMICs, including a lack of political support for vaccination campaigns, greater resource allocation to other health issues, and poor education and awareness about vaccines among healthcare workers and parents, specifically mothers (8)(9)(10). The lack of education about the benefits of immunization and risks of disease in LMICs further limits vaccine uptake, leading individuals to believe that immunization has a high cost-benefit ratio (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%