Recovery of dielectric strength and post-arc currents after diffuse and constricted vacuum arcs were measured for filat OFHC-Cu contacts (D = 25 mm, d = 7.5 mm) enclosed in a bakable UHV chamber. The arc current pulse had a trapezoidal shape of 5.5-ms duration with peak values up to 11 kA. In comparison with the fast recovery of diffuse arcs, the recovery of constricted arcs with gross melting is considerably retarded. Post-arc currents are simulated using the Andrews-Varey model extended to include the effects of secondary electron emission due to ion bombardment of the cathode and loss of the plasma due to thermal motion. The flow of charge carriers to the anode and the shield, which is at the anode's potential, are registered separately. The amount and decay of the residual plasma is evaluated from the measurements of post-arc current. The decay times of a few tens of a microsecond give evidence of ions with energies below 1 eV. The origin and effect of slow ions on recovery is discussed. I. INTRODUCTION R ECOVERY of vacuum interrupters after high-fault currents determines their interruption capability in commercial networks. The observed reduction of the dielectric strength during recovery has been attributed to the presence of metal vapor [1], [2] or plasma [3], [4], to surface irregularities, and to metal droplets [5]. However, there exists no experimental evidence of the relative importance of these effects [6].This paper aims to investigate the behavior of residual plasma after the extinction of arc currents of varying amplitudes and to determine its influence on the recovery of the dielectric strength. The trapezoidal pulse of current chosen ensured stationary conditions within the plasma during the current plateau. For peak values higher than 3 kA, the arc was constricted and melting of the contacts occurred. The rate of decline was chosen to correspond to sinusoidal currents of up to 40-kA peak. For the sake of high flexibility, the probing high-voltage pulse was delivered from a separate circuit. Rise time and peak values were greater than usual, in order to go beyond the limit of successful current-interruption and induce reignition. The same method had been applied before by Farrall [6].