2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2020.101528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vadalog: A modern architecture for automated reasoning with large knowledge graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If x occurs only in invaded positions, x is an attacked harmful variable. Without loss of generality (as more complex joins can be broken into steps (Bellomarini et al 2020)), we define protected harmful join rule as a rule of the form:…”
Section: Relationship Between Shy and Wardedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If x occurs only in invaded positions, x is an attacked harmful variable. Without loss of generality (as more complex joins can be broken into steps (Bellomarini et al 2020)), we define protected harmful join rule as a rule of the form:…”
Section: Relationship Between Shy and Wardedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Shy was introduced as part of the parsimonious class (Leone et al 2012) and is adopted in the system DLV ∃ (Leone et al 2017). Likewise, Warded was recently introduced as fragment of the Datalog ± family (Calì et al 2010) and is implemented as logic core of the reasoner Vadalog system (Bellomarini et al 2020). Both find many industrial applications in the financial, media intelligence, security, logistics, pricing domains, and more (Berger et al 2019;Adrian et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hay gran cantidad de investigaciones que aplican el GC para representar el conocimiento (Bellomarini et al, 2020;Jia et al, 2017;Krenn & Zeilinger, 2020;Lin et al, 2017;Zhu et al, 2019). La estructura del GC facilita la utilización de ponderaciones que permiten obtener nuevo conocimiento y conclusiones de datos existentes Li & Madden, 2019;.…”
Section: Revisión De La Literaturaunclassified
“…Nowadays, the terms ontology or ontology language in the context of knowledge representation is most likely to remind us about the Web Ontology Language (OWL) from the Semantic Web [24] or, for the younger ones among us, of Knowledge Graphs (KGs). Already these two terms evoque a large variety of languages, from the different formalisms used in modern KGs [4,14], to the existing OWL 2 profiles [54], to the many description logic [2] formalisms that are less expressive than SROIQ [40], the logic underlying OWL 2. Despite this variety, one can easily think of features which are not covered by any one of these languages.…”
Section: Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these situations is then treated as a classical ontology containing all axioms which are assumed to hold, with its usual semantics and entailment relation. 4 At this point, every consequence can be given a probability which is based on the probabilities of the subontologies where the entailment holds. The only problem is to identify such probabilities, which depend on the relationships between axioms, and might not be completely obvious.…”
Section: Use the Right Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%