2003
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.157.6.560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Refractory Epilepsy

Abstract: Seizure reduction was the same in patients younger than 12 years and 12 years or older and in patients with shorter and longer histories of refractory epilepsy. Adverse effects were few in this population, particularly in those younger than 12 years. Vagal nerve stimulation appears to be a relatively safe and potentially effective treatment for children with severely intractable epilepsy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were similar to those of earlier studies, in which 30% of patients had a >75% decrease in seizure frequency 6 months after VNS implantation (1) and 45% achieved a >50% reduction (2, 4-6). Although not statistically significant, we found that this reduction in seizure rate tended to be inversely related to seizure duration before VNS implantation and to the mean age at starting VNS therapy (2, 7). VNS also tended to be tolerated better and to be more effective in younger patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were similar to those of earlier studies, in which 30% of patients had a >75% decrease in seizure frequency 6 months after VNS implantation (1) and 45% achieved a >50% reduction (2, 4-6). Although not statistically significant, we found that this reduction in seizure rate tended to be inversely related to seizure duration before VNS implantation and to the mean age at starting VNS therapy (2, 7). VNS also tended to be tolerated better and to be more effective in younger patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Due to the possible unfavorable effects of multiple anti-epileptic drugs on development, VNS is of particular interest in children and adolescents; over 25% of the approximately 30,000 patients receiving vagus nerve stimulator implants to date have been children and adolescents younger than 18 yr of age (1). Moreover, VNS has shown a higher degree of efficacy and tolerance in children than in adults (2). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a patient no longer responds to AED treatment, the disease state is categorized as refractory epilepsy. The only treatment options for patients with refractory epilepsy are invasive procedures such as vagal nerve stimulation (Murphy, 2003), hemispherectomy (Obrador & Larramendi, 1953; Chandra et al, 2008), or complete removal of affected areas (resection) (Penfield & Baldwin, 1952; Schramm & Clusmann, 2008). Studies have shown refractory epilepsy coincides with increased expression of P-glyprotein or multi-drug resistance efflux pumps, which may limit therapeutic concentrations of AEDs from entering the brain (Tishler et al, 1995; Lazarowski et al, 2007).…”
Section: Existing Pharmacological Therapies For Cns Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…found that 45% of the children with VNS experienced greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency at six months, with 18% of the children being seizure-free. [19] Rossignol and colleagues followed a cohort of 28 adolescents and children implanted with VNS, for nonsurgical refractory epilepsy, and reported that 68% experienced greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency at two years, with 14% being seizure-free. [26] Rychlicki et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21931] Patel and Edwards have reported that in all cases of VNS pocket infections, removal of the device is necessary to achieve a cure. [24] Some authors, however, suggest that IV antibiotics without hardware removal may be an option for the management of these cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%