2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02731-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vagus nerve participates in CCK-induced Fos expression in hindbrain but not myenteric plexus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
22
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although apparently at odds with previous studies conducted on vagotomized or capsaicin-treated animals (53), one should consider the technical differences between our study and the studies of Sayegh and Ritter (53), foremost the deafferentation procedures. In fact, Sayegh and Ritter did their experiments 8 wk after conducting a complete subdiaphragmatic vagotomy or after systemic administration of capsaicin; conversely, we conducted our experimental procedures 5-10 days after afferent rhizotomy and subdiaphragmatic vagotomy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although apparently at odds with previous studies conducted on vagotomized or capsaicin-treated animals (53), one should consider the technical differences between our study and the studies of Sayegh and Ritter (53), foremost the deafferentation procedures. In fact, Sayegh and Ritter did their experiments 8 wk after conducting a complete subdiaphragmatic vagotomy or after systemic administration of capsaicin; conversely, we conducted our experimental procedures 5-10 days after afferent rhizotomy and subdiaphragmatic vagotomy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…The longer postsurgical recovery period allowed by these colleagues (i.e., 8 wk) before the experimentation may well have induced a degeneration of vagal afferent fibers, as well as NTS and DMV neurons, whereas our selective surgery and relatively short recovery period are likely to have affected only vagal afferent terminals. Sayegh and Ritter (53) reported that the c-Fos expression elicited by CCK-8s was decreased in vagotomized vs. control rats [see, for example, columns 1 (control saline), vs. column 2 (control CCK-8s), vs. column 5 (vagotomized CCK-8s), in Table 1 Indeed, similar to our data, systemic CCK-8s administration induced a (possibly significant) increase in cFos expression also in the vagotomized rats reported in their study (53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several similarities between CCK and apoA-IV. Secretion of each is induced by fat absorption, and this lipid-induced stimulation is dependent on chylomicron formation ( 54,120,128 ). In addition, both act peripherally (after either ip or iv administration) as well as centrally to reduce food intake ( 82,129,130 ).…”
Section: Apoa-iv As a Satiety Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vagal afferent fibers use glutamate as their main transmitter onto NTS neurons (Andresen and Yang, 1990;Smith et al, 1998;Jean, 2001;Baptista et al, 2005b;Travagli et al, 2006) and intraperitoneal administration of satiety agents (e.g., CCK, glucagon-like peptide-1, or cocaine-and amphetamine-regulated transcript) increases c-Fos expression in NTS (Rinaman et al, 1993;Zittel et al, 1999;Sayegh and Ritter, 2000;Zheng et al, 2002b;Cano et al, 2003;Gulley et al, 2005;Arora and Anubhuti, 2006;Berthoud et al, 2006), including the POMC neurons of the caudal NTS (Appleyard et al, 2005). This c-Fos expression is likely caused by increased glutamate release, because administration of glutamatergic antagonists decreases satiety (Covasa et al, 2004a,b;Zheng et al, 1999Zheng et al, , 2002a.…”
Section: Implications For the Control Of Food Intakementioning
confidence: 99%