2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.90.029704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valanju, Walser, and Valanju Reply:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
127
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
127
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(5,7,8) prove the statement. One can see that the criterion which distinguishes between LHM and RM is independent of the sign of n.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(5,7,8) prove the statement. One can see that the criterion which distinguishes between LHM and RM is independent of the sign of n.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Smith and Kroll (SK) argued [5] that in the LHM the refractive index should be negative while the group velocity (GV) is positive. This point of view is widely spread now [6,7,8,9,10]. Based upon this statement Valanju et al [7] challenged the Veselago's results and claimed that the refraction on the RM-LHM interface is positive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ziolkowski [29] studied wave propagation in DNG medium both analytically and numerically. Valanju et al [30] found positive and very inhomogeneous wave refraction in this unusual medium. Ramakrishna [31] examined the problem of designing such materials which have negative material parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%