Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '95 1995
DOI: 10.1145/223355.223457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating an extension to participatory heuristic evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of assessment/evaluation, they treat systems as self-contained objects, which largely marginalizes the humanistic aspects of systems. To make up for this shortcoming, this study also considered three additional heuristics selected from Muller et al's (1995; 1998) Participatory Heuristic Evaluation, which take a 'process-oriented' perspective and place emphasis on the fit of the system to users and their work needs. The main difference between the product-oriented and the process-oriented paradigm is that the former focuses on the system itself whereas the latter emphasises on the human work process that the system is intended to support.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of assessment/evaluation, they treat systems as self-contained objects, which largely marginalizes the humanistic aspects of systems. To make up for this shortcoming, this study also considered three additional heuristics selected from Muller et al's (1995; 1998) Participatory Heuristic Evaluation, which take a 'process-oriented' perspective and place emphasis on the fit of the system to users and their work needs. The main difference between the product-oriented and the process-oriented paradigm is that the former focuses on the system itself whereas the latter emphasises on the human work process that the system is intended to support.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, only a couple of studies have taken up this challenge and investigated redesign proposals as an outcome of usability evaluation [7,21,31,35]. For example, Dutt et al [7] considers the ability of heuristic evaluation and cognitive walkthrough to produce requirements for redesigns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early examples in corporate environments provided examples and experiences from various approaches (Blomberg & Henderson, 1990;Muller, 1991Muller, , 1992Schuler & Namioka, 1993). Extensions to the theory of participatory design include taxonomies (Muller, Wildman, & White, 1992) and applications to heuristic evaluation (Muller & McClard, 1995). This approach has been further validated by application to a variety of domains, including middle and high school science teaching (Chin, Rosson, & Carroll, 1997), emergency medicine (Kristensen et al, 2006), orientation for people with amnesia (Wu et al, 2005), support for people with aphasia (Boyd-Graber et al, 2006;Moffatt, McGrenere, Purves, & Klawe, 2004), cooperative inquiry and the use of children as design partners (Druin, 1999(Druin, , 2002, and shared family calendars (Neustaedter & Brush, 2006;Plaisant, Clamage, Hutchinson, Bederson, & Druin, 2006).…”
Section: Models Theories and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%