2006
DOI: 10.1109/tc.2006.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating Families of Latency Insensitive Protocols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance analyses are discussed in [14,15,19,23,24,29]. Formal verification of Latency Insensitive systems is described in [14,73,74]. Some optimizations are described in [14,15,19,23,24,29].…”
Section: Further Readingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance analyses are discussed in [14,15,19,23,24,29]. Formal verification of Latency Insensitive systems is described in [14,73,74]. Some optimizations are described in [14,15,19,23,24,29].…”
Section: Further Readingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formal, mathematically sound studies have shown how to guarantee equivalence with an appropriate LIP 1 and how to validate protocol correctness. 8 Concerning performance modeling, Lu and Koh have analyzed the upper bound achievable by Carloni, McMillan, and Sangiovanni-Vincentelli's LIP, using a netlist graph and max-plus algebra. 9 LIP performance depends on the amount of latency in wires, and this value is known only after layout.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%