2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10337-021-04041-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and Comparison of Two Analytical Methods for Imatinib Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is commonly used in comparative studies, where compared variables are the subject of random error, which is not taken into account in the least-squares regression method [ 16 , 17 ]. Examples of use of this type of regression might be found in clinical chemistry [ 18 , 19 ] and bioanalytical analysis [ 20 ]. Application of Deming regression requires a calculation of the ratio between squared standard deviations of both variables [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly used in comparative studies, where compared variables are the subject of random error, which is not taken into account in the least-squares regression method [ 16 , 17 ]. Examples of use of this type of regression might be found in clinical chemistry [ 18 , 19 ] and bioanalytical analysis [ 20 ]. Application of Deming regression requires a calculation of the ratio between squared standard deviations of both variables [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical method was successfully validated in terms of linearity, accuracy and precision within the range of 250-3000 ng/mL following the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Food and the Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations for the validation of analytical methods in biological fluids. 33,34 Overall precision and accuracy were lower than 6% in all the samples evaluated. 35…”
Section: Bioanalytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, the HPLC-UV/PDA method emerges as a rapid, economical, simple, accurate, precise, and reliable analytical technique for routine quantification of TKIs in clinical samples. Structurally speaking, TKIs exhibit characteristic absorption ranges at the wavelength of 230–326 nm for imatinib [ [99] , [100] , [101] , [102] , [103] , [104] , [105] ], 260–325 nm for dasatinib [ [106] , [107] , [108] , [109] , [110] ], 235–265.5 nm for sorafenib [ 30 , 102 , 111 ], 265–385 nm for nintedanib [ 112 , 113 ], 277 nm for sunitinib [ 114 ], etc. Sakhi et al [ 30 ] developed a sensitive HPLC/UV method for the determination of sorafenib in standard solutions and spiked plasma.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter was optimized using a 3-level factorial design approach, and the best results were obtained under the following conditions: C 18 column, ammonium format buffer consisting of acetonitrile (28.19:71.81, V / V ), and buffer with pH 3. This optimized method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study, demonstrating high recovery (99.91%), specificity (99.94%), precision (RSD < 0.543%), and robustness (RSD < 0.500%) ( Table S1 ) [ 2 , 3 , 5 , 8 , 12 , [15] , [16] , [17] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [37] , [38] , [39] , 41 , [48] , [49] , [50] , 52 , 54 , 55 , 61 , 63 , 64 , 76 , 80 , 83 , 84 , 86 , [88] , [89] , [90] , [91] , [92] , [93] , [94] , [95] , [97] , [98] , [99] , [100] , [101] , [102] , [103] , [104] , [105] , 109 , [111] , [112] , [113] , [114] ,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%