Validation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Polish Version of the Oswestry Disability Index

Miękisiak, Grzegorz; Kołłątaj, Marta; Dobrogowski, Jan; Kloc, Wojciech; Libionka, Witold; Banach, Mariusz; Łątka, Dariusz; Sobolewski, Tomasz; Sulewski, Adam; Nowakowski, Andrzej; Kiwic, Grzegorz; Pala, Adam; Potaczek, Tomasz; Gierlotka, Maciej

doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e31827e948b

Cited by 53 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is likely to be due to longer interval than that in the previous study . The longer interval is related to deterioration of correlation coefficients . In addition, it could also be due to the fact that patients with chronic pain caused by degenerative lumbar disease (not healthy controls) were studied.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 74%

“…Desired value for both floor and ceiling effects is <15%. 18 All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 20.0.0 statistics package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.). A value of P < 0.05 was accepted as significant.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Floor and ceiling effects were measured as the percent of patients who reported a minimum or maximum score of PSQ‐minor, PSQ‐moderate, and PSQ‐total, respectively. Desired value for both floor and ceiling effects is <15% . All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 20.0.0 statistics package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…12 The longer interval is related to deterioration of correlation coefficients. 18 In addition, it could also be due to the fact that patients with chronic pain caused by degenerative lumbar disease (not healthy controls) were studied. Indeed, PSQ test-retest reliability assessed in chronic pain patients over a 4-week interval was very similar to that found in the present study (ICC 0.72 for the PSQtotal and 0.71 for the PSQ-minor).…”

Section: Test-retest Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Translation, Cross‐Cultural Adaptation, and Validity of the Korean Version of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire in Chronic Pain Patients

Kim

Ruscheweyh²,

Yeo

et al. 2013

Pain Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to translate pain sensitivity questionnaires (PSQ) into the Korean language, perform a cross-cultural adaption of the PSQ, and validate the Korean version of PSQ in patients with degenerative spinal disease. The PSQ was translated forward and backward, cross-culturally adapted by 2 independent translators, and approved by an expert committee. The final Korean version of the PSQ was tested on 72 patients with degenerative spinal disease. Test-retest reliability was evaluated for 60 patients (83%) who completed the second assessment in an interval of 4 weeks. The mean PSQ-minor, PSQ-moderate, and PSQ-total (standard deviation [SD]) were 5.40 (2.02), 6.46 (1.98), and 5.93 (1.93), respectively. The PSQ-total, PSQ-minor, and PSQ-moderate of the Korean version showed very good internal consistencies determined by the Cronbach's α of 0.926, 0.869, and 0.877, respectively. For convergent validity, the PSQ scores of the Korean version showed significant correlations with pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) (r = 0.377, P = 0.002; r = 0.365, P = 0.003; r = 0.362, P = 0.003 for PSQ-total, PSQ-minor, and PSQ-moderate of the Korean version, respectively). For test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.782 for PSQ-total, 0.752 for PSQ-minor, and 0.793 for PSQ-moderate. In conclusion, the validated Korean version of PSQ is a transculturally equivalent, reliable, and valid tool to assess individual pain sensitivity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 74%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Test-retest Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Translation, Cross‐Cultural Adaptation, and Validity of the Korean Version of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire in Chronic Pain Patients

Kim

Ruscheweyh²,

Yeo

et al. 2013

Pain Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Unfortunately, publication in a refereed journal has not always ensured that this process has taken place. 7 There are also inaccurate versions on the Internet, which I have tried, with limited success, to get deleted.…”

Section: Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre Oxford University Hospitals Oxmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why are there different versions of the Oswestry Disability Index?

Fairbank¹

2014

SPI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article updates readers on the current state of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the impact of unvalidated versions. The ODI is now licensed to the Mapi Research Trust in order to preserve a standard version in English and in validated translations. A proposed threshold of “normality” is potentially helpful as an outcome for both audit and research. There is an application of the sex section as a quality measure in Germany. The ODI is an important international shared resource for clinicians and investigators and should not be abused. Its current status will not be enhanced by further modification. It is now registered with the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement as a standard outcome measure.

show abstract

Assessment of pressure pain threshold at the cervical and lumbar spine region in the group of professionally active nurses: A cross-sectional study

Kołcz

Jenaszek

2020

Journal of Occupational Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nurses during their professional activity are exposed to the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, static and dynamic destabilization of the spine, resulting in chronic pain syndromes, thereby increasing the risk of injuries. 1 Work-related musculoskeletal disorders can be caused by inappropriate movement patterns during professional activity, a weak body posture causing deep spinal and abdominal muscles to malfunction, and inadequate implementation of ergonomic work practices. 2

show abstract

Validation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Polish Version of the Oswestry Disability Index

Abstract: The results of this study indicate that the Polish version of the ODI is a reliable and valid instrument for the measurement of disability in Polish-speaking patients with lower back pain.

Cited by 53 publications

References 25 publications

Translation, Cross‐Cultural Adaptation, and Validity of the Korean Version of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire in Chronic Pain Patients

Translation, Cross‐Cultural Adaptation, and Validity of the Korean Version of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire in Chronic Pain Patients

Why are there different versions of the Oswestry Disability Index?

Assessment of pressure pain threshold at the cervical and lumbar spine region in the group of professionally active nurses: A cross-sectional study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About